<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(3)</volume><submitter>Zheng C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Background Although numerous studies have been published evaluating the positive or negative effects of altitude on cardiovascular disease, many of them are conflicting. Methods and Results Data come from 2 cross-sectional surveys using a similar method in China; and a total of 34 215 residents, aged ≥35 years, were eligible and recruited in the study. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), according to the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, was defined and evaluated. Altitude was divided into low (&lt;1500 m), middle (1500-3500 m), and high (≥3500 m) level groups. Among the 34 215 participants (aged 55.87 years; men, 45.92%; altitude ranging from 3.1 ~ 4507 m), 15 099 (crude prevalence, 44.13%), 517 (crude prevalence, 1.51%), and 272 (crude prevalence, 0.79%) were diagnosed as having grades I, II, and LVDD, respectively. Compared with low-level group, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) of LVDD for middle- and high-level groups were 1.65 (1.49-1.82) and 1.89 (1.63-2.19), respectively (&lt;i>P&lt;/i>&lt;sub>trend&lt;/sub>&lt;0.001). The ORs (95% CI) were 1.43 (1.31-1.56) and 2.03 (1.67-2.47) per 500-m increment for middle- and high-level groups. There was a nonlinear relationship (upward-sloping "W" shape) between altitude and the risk of LVDD, assessed by the restricted cubic spline. For each LVDD grade, ORs (95% CIs) of grade I LVDD for middle- and high-level groups were 1.75 (1.59-1.92) and 1.95 (1.69-2.25), respectively; for grade II, ORs (95% CIs) for middle- and high-level groups were 6.19 (3.67-10.42) and 5.27 (2.18-12.74), respectively. The stratified analyses indicated that LVDD was much more remarkably influenced by elevated altitude in men (&lt;i>P&lt;/i>&lt;sub>interaction&lt;/sub>=0.0019). Conclusions Higher altitude is associated with increased risk of LVDD among people living over 1500 m, especially for men.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American Heart Association</journal><pagination>e018079</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7955434</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Habitation Altitude and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: A Population-Based Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7955434</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Habitation Altitude and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: A Population-Based Study.</name><description>Background Although numerous studies have been published evaluating the positive or negative effects of altitude on cardiovascular disease, many of them are conflicting. Methods and Results Data come from 2 cross-sectional surveys using a similar method in China; and a total of 34 215 residents, aged ≥35 years, were eligible and recruited in the study. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), according to the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, was defined and evaluated. Altitude was divided into low (&lt;1500 m), middle (1500-3500 m), and high (≥3500 m) level groups. Among the 34 215 participants (aged 55.87 years; men, 45.92%; altitude ranging from 3.1 ~ 4507 m), 15 099 (crude prevalence, 44.13%), 517 (crude prevalence, 1.51%), and 272 (crude prevalence, 0.79%) were diagnosed as having grades I, II, and LVDD, respectively. Compared with low-level group, the odds ratios (ORs) (95% CIs) of LVDD for middle- and high-level groups were 1.65 (1.49-1.82) and 1.89 (1.63-2.19), respectively (&lt;i>P&lt;/i>&lt;sub>trend&lt;/sub>&lt;0.001). The ORs (95% CI) were 1.43 (1.31-1.56) and 2.03 (1.67-2.47) per 500-m increment for middle- and high-level groups. There was a nonlinear relationship (upward-sloping "W" shape) between altitude and the risk of LVDD, assessed by the restricted cubic spline. For each LVDD grade, ORs (95% CIs) of grade I LVDD for middle- and high-level groups were 1.75 (1.59-1.92) and 1.95 (1.69-2.25), respectively; for grade II, ORs (95% CIs) for middle- and high-level groups were 6.19 (3.67-10.42) and 5.27 (2.18-12.74), respectively. The stratified analyses indicated that LVDD was much more remarkably influenced by elevated altitude in men (&lt;i>P&lt;/i>&lt;sub>interaction&lt;/sub>=0.0019). Conclusions Higher altitude is associated with increased risk of LVDD among people living over 1500 m, especially for men.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T10:47:04.862Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:39:35.297Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7955434</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33459026</pubmed><doi>10.1161/JAHA.120.018079</doi></cross_references></HashMap>