<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Smith R</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>E74-E87</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7955838</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>46(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Imbalances in approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making (e.g., sacrificing rewards to avoid negative outcomes) are considered central to multiple psychiatric disorders. We used computational modelling to examine 2 factors that are often not distinguished in descriptive analyses of AAC: decision uncertainty and sensitivity to negative outcomes versus rewards (emotional conflict).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A previously validated AAC task was completed by 478 participants, including healthy controls (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 59), people with substance use disorders (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 159) and people with depression and/or anxiety disorders who did not have substance use disorders (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 260). Using an active inference model, we estimated individual-level values for a model parameter that refl</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of psychiatry &amp; neuroscience : JPN</journal><pubmed_title>Greater decision uncertainty characterizes a transdiagnostic patient sample during approach-avoidance conflict: a computational modelling approach.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7955838</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P20 GM121312</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 MH108707</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kuplicki R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kirlic N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Touthang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paulus MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aupperle RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khalsa SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feinstein J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Greater decision uncertainty characterizes a transdiagnostic patient sample during approach-avoidance conflict: a computational modelling approach.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Imbalances in approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making (e.g., sacrificing rewards to avoid negative outcomes) are considered central to multiple psychiatric disorders. We used computational modelling to examine 2 factors that are often not distinguished in descriptive analyses of AAC: decision uncertainty and sensitivity to negative outcomes versus rewards (emotional conflict).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A previously validated AAC task was completed by 478 participants, including healthy controls (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 59), people with substance use disorders (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 159) and people with depression and/or anxiety disorders who did not have substance use disorders (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 260). Using an active inference model, we estimated individual-level values for a model parameter that refl</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-25T19:28:58.623Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T07:58:21.773Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7955838</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33119490</pubmed><doi>10.1503/jpn.200032</doi></cross_references></HashMap>