<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(12)</volume><submitter>Lee NJ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging has recently been introduced as a promising diagnostic modality in intracranial artery disease. Our aim was to compare high-resolution MR imaging with digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of various intracranial artery diseases.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-seven patients who had undergone both high-resolution MR imaging and DSA for intracranial artery disease were enrolled in our study (August 2011 to April 2014). The time interval between the high-resolution MR imaging and DSA was within 1 month. The degree of stenosis and the minimal luminal diameter were independently measured by 2 observers in both DSA and high-resolution MR imaging, and the results were compared. Two observers independently diagnosed intracranial artery diseases on DSA and high-resolution MR imaging. The time interval between the diagnoses on DSA and high-resolution MR imaging was 2 weeks. Interobserver diagnostic agreement for each technique and intermodality diagnostic agreement for each observer were acquired.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging showed moderate-to-excellent agreement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.892-0.949; κ = 0.548-0.614) and significant correlations (R = 0.766-892) with DSA on the degree of stenosis and minimal luminal diameter. The interobserver diagnostic agreement was good for DSA (κ = 0.643) and excellent for high-resolution MR imaging (κ = 0.818). The intermodality diagnostic agreement was good (κ = 0.704) for observer 1 and moderate (κ = 0.579) for observer 2, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging may be an imaging method comparable with DSA for the characterization and diagnosis of various intracranial artery diseases.</pubmed_abstract><journal>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology</journal><pagination>2245-2250</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7963882</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of High-Resolution MR Imaging and Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Characterization and Diagnosis of Intracranial Artery Disease.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7963882</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Choi CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang DW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kwon SU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suh DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung SC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of High-Resolution MR Imaging and Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Characterization and Diagnosis of Intracranial Artery Disease.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging has recently been introduced as a promising diagnostic modality in intracranial artery disease. Our aim was to compare high-resolution MR imaging with digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of various intracranial artery diseases.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-seven patients who had undergone both high-resolution MR imaging and DSA for intracranial artery disease were enrolled in our study (August 2011 to April 2014). The time interval between the high-resolution MR imaging and DSA was within 1 month. The degree of stenosis and the minimal luminal diameter were independently measured by 2 observers in both DSA and high-resolution MR imaging, and the results were compared. Two observers independently diagnosed intracranial artery diseases on DSA and high-resolution MR imaging. The time interval between the diagnoses on DSA and high-resolution MR imaging was 2 weeks. Interobserver diagnostic agreement for each technique and intermodality diagnostic agreement for each observer were acquired.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging showed moderate-to-excellent agreement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.892-0.949; κ = 0.548-0.614) and significant correlations (R = 0.766-892) with DSA on the degree of stenosis and minimal luminal diameter. The interobserver diagnostic agreement was good for DSA (κ = 0.643) and excellent for high-resolution MR imaging (κ = 0.818). The intermodality diagnostic agreement was good (κ = 0.704) for observer 1 and moderate (κ = 0.579) for observer 2, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>High-resolution MR imaging may be an imaging method comparable with DSA for the characterization and diagnosis of various intracranial artery diseases.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Dec</publication><modification>2024-12-03T17:10:42.443Z</modification><creation>2024-12-03T17:10:42.443Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7963882</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27659192</pubmed><doi>10.3174/ajnr.a4950</doi><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A4950</doi></cross_references></HashMap>