<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Lopez Steinmetz LC</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> We aimed to: (1) analyze differences in both general (in terms of psychological well-being/discomfort, social functioning and coping, and psychological distress) and specific (depression, trait-anxiety, negative alcohol-related consequences, and suicidal risk) mental health state (MHS) in college students, residing in four different Argentinean regions (center, north, south, and the most populated) exposed to different spread-rates of the COVID-19; (2) analyze between-group differences in both general and specific MHS indicators at four quarantine sub-periods (twice prior, and twice following the first quarantine extension). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> We used a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample including 2,687 college students. Data was collected online during the Argentinean quarantine. We calculated one-way between-groups ANOVA with Tukey's &lt;i>post hoc&lt;/i> test. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> Regionally, the center and the most populated area differed in psychological well-being/discomfort and negative alcohol-related consequences, but not in the remaining MHS indicators. According to the quarantine sub-periods, there were differences in psychological well-being/discomfort, social functioning and coping, psychological distress, and negative alcohol-related consequences. Negative alcohol-related consequences were the only MHS indicator improving over time. For all of the remaining MHS indicators, we found a similar deterioration pattern in the course of time, with mean scores decreasing from the first to the 2nd week of the quarantine pre-extensions, then increasing toward the 1st week of the quarantine post-extension (with some MHS indicators reaching mean scores worse than the start), and then continued to increase. &lt;b>Conclusion:&lt;/b> A worsened mean MHS during quarantine suggests that quarantine and its extensions contribute to negative mental health impacts.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in psychiatry</journal><pagination>557880</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7969711</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Mental Health Impacts in Argentinean College Students During COVID-19 Quarantine.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7969711</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Lopez Steinmetz LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dutto Florio MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fong SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Godoy JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leyes CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez Steinmetz RL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mental Health Impacts in Argentinean College Students During COVID-19 Quarantine.</name><description>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> We aimed to: (1) analyze differences in both general (in terms of psychological well-being/discomfort, social functioning and coping, and psychological distress) and specific (depression, trait-anxiety, negative alcohol-related consequences, and suicidal risk) mental health state (MHS) in college students, residing in four different Argentinean regions (center, north, south, and the most populated) exposed to different spread-rates of the COVID-19; (2) analyze between-group differences in both general and specific MHS indicators at four quarantine sub-periods (twice prior, and twice following the first quarantine extension). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> We used a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample including 2,687 college students. Data was collected online during the Argentinean quarantine. We calculated one-way between-groups ANOVA with Tukey's &lt;i>post hoc&lt;/i> test. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> Regionally, the center and the most populated area differed in psychological well-being/discomfort and negative alcohol-related consequences, but not in the remaining MHS indicators. According to the quarantine sub-periods, there were differences in psychological well-being/discomfort, social functioning and coping, psychological distress, and negative alcohol-related consequences. Negative alcohol-related consequences were the only MHS indicator improving over time. For all of the remaining MHS indicators, we found a similar deterioration pattern in the course of time, with mean scores decreasing from the first to the 2nd week of the quarantine pre-extensions, then increasing toward the 1st week of the quarantine post-extension (with some MHS indicators reaching mean scores worse than the start), and then continued to increase. &lt;b>Conclusion:&lt;/b> A worsened mean MHS during quarantine suggests that quarantine and its extensions contribute to negative mental health impacts.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2025-04-04T19:10:26.371Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T19:10:26.371Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7969711</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33746788</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fpsyt.2021.557880</doi></cross_references></HashMap>