<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Petrocchi S</submitter><funding>Innovative Medicines Initiative</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> The potential value of patient preference studies has been recognized in clinical individual treatment decision-making between clinicians and patients, as well as in upstream drug decision-making. Drug developers, regulators, reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies are exploring how the use of patient preference studies could inform drug development, regulatory benefit risk-assessment and reimbursement decisions respectively. Understanding patient preferences may be especially valuable in decisions regarding Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment options, where a variety of treatment options with different characteristics raise uncertainty about which features are most important to NSCLC patients. As part of the Innovative Medicines Initiative P</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in pharmacology</journal><pagination>602112</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7970036</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>What Matters Most to Lung Cancer Patients? A Qualitative Study in Italy and Belgium to Investigate Patient Preferences.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7970036</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Smith MY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Louis E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pravettoni G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vandevelde M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arnou R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oliveri S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petrocchi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Durosini I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janssens R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galli G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Marinis F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nackaerts K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huys I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guiddi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gianoncelli L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>What Matters Most to Lung Cancer Patients? A Qualitative Study in Italy and Belgium to Investigate Patient Preferences.</name><description>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> The potential value of patient preference studies has been recognized in clinical individual treatment decision-making between clinicians and patients, as well as in upstream drug decision-making. Drug developers, regulators, reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies are exploring how the use of patient preference studies could inform drug development, regulatory benefit risk-assessment and reimbursement decisions respectively. Understanding patient preferences may be especially valuable in decisions regarding Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment options, where a variety of treatment options with different characteristics raise uncertainty about which features are most important to NSCLC patients. As part of the Innovative Medicines Initiative P</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2025-04-04T22:00:37.921Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T22:00:37.921Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7970036</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33746750</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fphar.2021.602112</doi></cross_references></HashMap>