<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cramer-van der Welle CM</submitter><funding>KWF Kankerbestrijding</funding><pagination>6306</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7973789</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>This study aims to assess how clinical outcomes of immunotherapy in real-world (effectiveness) correspond to outcomes in clinical trials (efficacy) and to look into factors that might explain an efficacy-effectiveness (EE) gap. All patients diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2015-2018 in six Dutch large teaching hospitals (Santeon network) were identified and followed-up from date of diagnosis until death or end of data collection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and second-line (2L) nivolumab were compared with clinical trial data by calculating hazard ratios (HRs). From 1950 diagnosed patients, 1005 (52%) started with any 1L treatment, of which 83 received pembrolizumab. Nivolumab was started as 2L tr</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pubmed_title>Real-world outcomes versus clinical trial results of immunotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Netherlands.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7973789</pmcid><funding_grant_id>SAN2016-7942</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>van den Borne BEEM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cramer-van der Welle CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smit AAJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schramel FMNH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santeon NSCLC Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kastelijn EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tonn M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peters BJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Groen HJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van de Garde EMW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schouwink JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klungel OH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vermeer LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verschueren MV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Putten JWG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Real-world outcomes versus clinical trial results of immunotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Netherlands.</name><description>This study aims to assess how clinical outcomes of immunotherapy in real-world (effectiveness) correspond to outcomes in clinical trials (efficacy) and to look into factors that might explain an efficacy-effectiveness (EE) gap. All patients diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2015-2018 in six Dutch large teaching hospitals (Santeon network) were identified and followed-up from date of diagnosis until death or end of data collection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first-line (1L) pembrolizumab and second-line (2L) nivolumab were compared with clinical trial data by calculating hazard ratios (HRs). From 1950 diagnosed patients, 1005 (52%) started with any 1L treatment, of which 83 received pembrolizumab. Nivolumab was started as 2L tr</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-22T17:55:27.447Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T02:14:00.984Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7973789</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33737641</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-021-85696-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>