<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Stegwee SI</submitter><funding>ZonMw</funding><pagination>866-878</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7983985</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate whether double-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) is superior compared with single-layer uterine closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting and niche development in the uterine caesarean scar.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Thirty-two hospitals in the Netherlands.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>A total of 2292 women aged ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned to each procedure (1:1): 1144 women were assigned to single-layer uterine closure and 1148 women were assigned to double-layer uterine closure.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Single-layer unlocked closure and double-layer unlocked closure, with the second layer imbricating the first.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Number of days wi</pubmed_abstract><journal>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7983985</pmcid><funding_grant_id>843002605</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bekker MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Kesteren PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Boer K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van de Ven PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huirne J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Alili M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feitsma AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Leeuw RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Vleeschouwer LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meijer WJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scheepers HL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janssen CI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huisjes AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Laar JO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Voet L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Langenveld J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Baal WM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Radder CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>2Close study group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hink E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Visser H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ben AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bongers MY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hermes W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rijnders RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Voet LF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Beek E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Groot C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hemelaar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sueters M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Vliet HA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pajkrt E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schippers DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambalk CB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosmans JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boormans EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Eijndhoven HW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papatsonis DN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oei AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stegwee SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hehenkamp WJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schuitemaker NW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kapiteijn K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duijnhoven RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaplan M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate whether double-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) is superior compared with single-layer uterine closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting and niche development in the uterine caesarean scar.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Thirty-two hospitals in the Netherlands.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>A total of 2292 women aged ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned to each procedure (1:1): 1144 women were assigned to single-layer uterine closure and 1148 women were assigned to double-layer uterine closure.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Single-layer unlocked closure and double-layer unlocked closure, with the second layer imbricating the first.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Number of days wi</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-18T17:41:00.734Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T05:17:50.861Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7983985</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32892392</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.16472</doi></cross_references></HashMap>