<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>75(3)</volume><submitter>Schaap M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>To evaluate the long-term (5 years) effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate. We explored the barriers and facilitators of the performance of perioperative briefing and debriefing to explain its effects on team climate and to make recommendations for further improvement of surgical safety tools.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A mixed-method evaluation study was carried out amongst surgical staff at a tertiary care university hospital with 593-bed capacity in the Netherlands. Thirteen surgical teams were included. Team climate inventory and a standardised evaluation questionnaire were used to measure team climate (primary outcome) and experiences with perioperative briefing and debriefing (secondary outcome), respectively. Thirteen surgical team members particip</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of clinical practice</journal><pagination>e13689</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7988591</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate: A mixed-method evaluation study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7988591</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Meijerink JWJHJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schaap M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanskamp-Sebregts M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heideveld-Chevalking AAJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merkx TMAW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate: A mixed-method evaluation study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>To evaluate the long-term (5 years) effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on team climate. We explored the barriers and facilitators of the performance of perioperative briefing and debriefing to explain its effects on team climate and to make recommendations for further improvement of surgical safety tools.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A mixed-method evaluation study was carried out amongst surgical staff at a tertiary care university hospital with 593-bed capacity in the Netherlands. Thirteen surgical teams were included. Team climate inventory and a standardised evaluation questionnaire were used to measure team climate (primary outcome) and experiences with perioperative briefing and debriefing (secondary outcome), respectively. Thirteen surgical team members particip</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T22:00:41.19Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T22:00:41.19Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7988591</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32865281</pubmed><doi>10.1111/ijcp.13689</doi></cross_references></HashMap>