<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Reaser JK</submitter><funding>Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency</funding><funding>U.S. Department of Agriculture</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>e13357</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7995086</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>29(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Ecological restoration should be regarded as a public health service. Unfortunately, the lack of quantitative linkages between environmental and human health has limited recognition of this principle. The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic provides the impetus for further discussion. We propose ecological countermeasures as highly targeted, landscape-based interventions to arrest the drivers of land use-induced zoonotic spillover. We provide examples of ecological restoration activities that reduce zoonotic disease risk and a five-point action plan at the human-ecosystem health nexus. In conclusion, we make the case that ecological countermeasures are a tenet of restoration ecology with human health goals.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Restoration ecology</journal><pubmed_title>Ecological countermeasures for preventing zoonotic disease outbreaks: when ecological restoration is a human health imperative.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7995086</pmcid><funding_grant_id>D18AC00031</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PREEMPT D18AC00031</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NIFA Hatch 1015891</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DEB‐1716698</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Reaser JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Witt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tabor GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hudson PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plowright RK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Ecological countermeasures for preventing zoonotic disease outbreaks: when ecological restoration is a human health imperative.</name><description>Ecological restoration should be regarded as a public health service. Unfortunately, the lack of quantitative linkages between environmental and human health has limited recognition of this principle. The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic provides the impetus for further discussion. We propose ecological countermeasures as highly targeted, landscape-based interventions to arrest the drivers of land use-induced zoonotic spillover. We provide examples of ecological restoration activities that reduce zoonotic disease risk and a five-point action plan at the human-ecosystem health nexus. In conclusion, we make the case that ecological countermeasures are a tenet of restoration ecology with human health goals.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-29T11:28:02.357Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T19:54:58.226Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7995086</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33785998</pubmed><doi>10.1111/rec.13357</doi></cross_references></HashMap>