<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Giri VK</submitter><funding>National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>American Society of Hematology</funding><pagination>262.e1-262.e11</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8010223</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) occur in 20% to 45% of inpatient autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Daily bathing with the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of BSIs in critically ill patients, although very few studies include HCT patients or have evaluated the impact of compliance on effectiveness. We conducted a prospective cohort study with historical controls to assess the impact of CHG bathing on the rate of BSIs and gut microbiota composition among adults undergoing inpatient HCT at the Duke University Medical Center. We present 1 year of data without CHG bathing (2016) and 2 years of data when CHG was used on the HCT unit (2017 and 2018). Because not all patients adhered to CHG, patients were grouped in</pubmed_abstract><journal>Transplantation and cellular therapy</journal><pubmed_title>Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Reduces the Incidence of Bloodstream Infections in Adults Undergoing Inpatient Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8010223</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002553</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 AG066388</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08 HL143189</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR001115</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gasparetto CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giri VK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Messina JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andermann TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van den Brink MRM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ren Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomes ALC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chao NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kegerreis KG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allen DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Long GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sung AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bohannon LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mowery YM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peled JU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarantopoulos S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenberg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matthews A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saullo JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horwitz ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lassiter M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sito E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lobaugh-Jin E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rizzieri DA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Reduces the Incidence of Bloodstream Infections in Adults Undergoing Inpatient Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.</name><description>Bloodstream infections (BSIs) occur in 20% to 45% of inpatient autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Daily bathing with the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of BSIs in critically ill patients, although very few studies include HCT patients or have evaluated the impact of compliance on effectiveness. We conducted a prospective cohort study with historical controls to assess the impact of CHG bathing on the rate of BSIs and gut microbiota composition among adults undergoing inpatient HCT at the Duke University Medical Center. We present 1 year of data without CHG bathing (2016) and 2 years of data when CHG was used on the HCT unit (2017 and 2018). Because not all patients adhered to CHG, patients were grouped in</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:17:10.465Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T10:17:10.465Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8010223</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33781532</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.004</doi></cross_references></HashMap>