{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Snyder HR"],"funding":["NIMH NIH HHS","National Institute of Mental Health"],"pagination":["1080-1096"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8058111"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["28(4)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Despite overlapping terminology and assumptions that they tap the same constructs, executive function (EF) task performance and EF/effortful control (EC) questionnaires have been reported to be only weakly correlated. It is unclear if this reflects true lack of association or methodological limitations. The current study addresses past methodological limitations using a preregistered latent variable approach in a community youth sample (<i>N</i> = 291, age 13-22 years). EF task performance was assessed with a well-validated battery inhibition, shifting, and updating tasks. Self-reported EF/EC was assessed using the predominant temperament measure (Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised [EATQ-R]), and a self-report assessment more closely aligned with EF constructs (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Self-Report [BRIEF-SR]). Bifactor models fit the BRIEF-SR, EATQ-R and EF task measures well. Self-reported EF/EC and EF task factors were only weakly correlated on average in youth, although there were some stronger associations in older youth. These results suggest that task-based measures of EF and self-report measures of EF/EC may be best viewed as complementary, but largely distinct, windows on cognitive control."],"journal":["Assessment"],"pubmed_title":["Associations Between Task Performance and Self-Report Measures of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Distinct Abilities."],"pmcid":["PMC8058111"],"funding_grant_id":["F32MH098481","R21 MH102210","R21MH102210","R01 MH063207","F32 MH098481","R01MH063207"],"pubmed_authors":["Hankin BL","Friedman NP","Snyder HR"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Associations Between Task Performance and Self-Report Measures of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Distinct Abilities.","description":"Despite overlapping terminology and assumptions that they tap the same constructs, executive function (EF) task performance and EF/effortful control (EC) questionnaires have been reported to be only weakly correlated. It is unclear if this reflects true lack of association or methodological limitations. The current study addresses past methodological limitations using a preregistered latent variable approach in a community youth sample (<i>N</i> = 291, age 13-22 years). EF task performance was assessed with a well-validated battery inhibition, shifting, and updating tasks. Self-reported EF/EC was assessed using the predominant temperament measure (Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised [EATQ-R]), and a self-report assessment more closely aligned with EF constructs (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Self-Report [BRIEF-SR]). Bifactor models fit the BRIEF-SR, EATQ-R and EF task measures well. Self-reported EF/EC and EF task factors were only weakly correlated on average in youth, although there were some stronger associations in older youth. These results suggest that task-based measures of EF and self-report measures of EF/EC may be best viewed as complementary, but largely distinct, windows on cognitive control.","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Jun","modification":"2025-04-29T11:31:18.187Z","creation":"2025-04-06T19:54:49.964Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8058111","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33084353"],"doi":["10.1177/1073191120965694"]}}