<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Howe CG</submitter><funding>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</funding><funding>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</funding><funding>University of South Carolina</funding><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>110388</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8079562</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>196</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Fetal growth is predictive of health later in life. Both toxic and essential metals influence fetal growth, but most studies have focused on these elements individually and used birth weight as an indicator of fetal growth. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of a mixture of metals on fetal size in mid-pregnancy in a predominately lower income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>For our primary analysis, we focused on six elements that have previously been associated individually with fetal size, including arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), molybdenum (Mo), and tin (Sn), measured in maternal urine samples collected in early pregnancy (median: 12.4 weeks gestation). In an exploratory analysis, we additionally included cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), antimony (Sb), and thallium (Tl). Using covariate-adjusted Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) as our main mixture modeling approach, we examined the impact of these metals on fetal biometry measures obtained between 18 and 22 weeks gestation, with a focus on estimated fetal weight (EFW).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>BKMR identified Mo and Ba as the mixture components that contributed most to associations with EFW. Linear associations were observed for both metals. An increase in Mo from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 0.114 (95% credible interval (CI): 0.019, 0.247) SD higher EFW, equivalent to a 7.4 g difference. Similar associations were observed between Mo and the other fetal measures evaluated. In contrast, an increase in Ba from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a -0.076 (95% CI: 0.217, 0.066) SD lower EFW, equivalent to a 4.9 g difference. Similar inverse associations were observed for Ba in relation to abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. BKMR also identified a possible interaction between Ba and Mo in relation to head circumference, suggesting that the positive associations between Mo and this outcome may be attenuated at high levels of Ba, which was consistent with findings from linear regression (P&lt;sub>interaction&lt;/sub> = 0.03). In an exploratory analysis accounting for a larger mixture of metals, Mo and Ba consistently contributed most to associations with EFW. An inverse association was also identified between Sb and EFW.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our results suggest that Mo may promote fetal growth, while Ba and Sb may reduce fetal growth, in this population.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental research</journal><pubmed_title>Prenatal metal mixtures and fetal size in mid-pregnancy in the MADRES study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8079562</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U2C ES026553</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>4UH3OD023287-04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 ES024144</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K99 ES030400</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U2C ES026555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 ES022986</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>83615801–0</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30ES007048</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 ES026086</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023287</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U2CES026553</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U2CES026555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 ES030400</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 ES007048</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Farzan SF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bastain TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howe CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Claus Henn B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richards MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Habre R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lerner D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grubbs BH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quimby A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meeker JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Breton CV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al-Marayati L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eckel SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Twogood S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chavez TA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faham D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prenatal metal mixtures and fetal size in mid-pregnancy in the MADRES study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Fetal growth is predictive of health later in life. Both toxic and essential metals influence fetal growth, but most studies have focused on these elements individually and used birth weight as an indicator of fetal growth. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of a mixture of metals on fetal size in mid-pregnancy in a predominately lower income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>For our primary analysis, we focused on six elements that have previously been associated individually with fetal size, including arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), molybdenum (Mo), and tin (Sn), measured in maternal urine samples collected in early pregnancy (median: 12.4 weeks gestation). In an exploratory analysis, we additionally included cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), antimony (Sb), and thallium (Tl). Using covariate-adjusted Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) as our main mixture modeling approach, we examined the impact of these metals on fetal biometry measures obtained between 18 and 22 weeks gestation, with a focus on estimated fetal weight (EFW).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>BKMR identified Mo and Ba as the mixture components that contributed most to associations with EFW. Linear associations were observed for both metals. An increase in Mo from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 0.114 (95% credible interval (CI): 0.019, 0.247) SD higher EFW, equivalent to a 7.4 g difference. Similar associations were observed between Mo and the other fetal measures evaluated. In contrast, an increase in Ba from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a -0.076 (95% CI: 0.217, 0.066) SD lower EFW, equivalent to a 4.9 g difference. Similar inverse associations were observed for Ba in relation to abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. BKMR also identified a possible interaction between Ba and Mo in relation to head circumference, suggesting that the positive associations between Mo and this outcome may be attenuated at high levels of Ba, which was consistent with findings from linear regression (P&lt;sub>interaction&lt;/sub> = 0.03). In an exploratory analysis accounting for a larger mixture of metals, Mo and Ba consistently contributed most to associations with EFW. An inverse association was also identified between Sb and EFW.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our results suggest that Mo may promote fetal growth, while Ba and Sb may reduce fetal growth, in this population.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-27T01:40:40.782Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T18:21:00.632Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8079562</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33129852</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2020.110388</doi></cross_references></HashMap>