<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Mallon PWG</submitter><funding>Science Foundation Ireland</funding><funding>European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme</funding><pagination>ofab122</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8083770</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although reports suggest that most individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop detectable antibodies postinfection, the kinetics, durability, and relative differences between immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses beyond the first few weeks after symptom onset remain poorly understood.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Within a large, well-phenotyped, diverse, prospective cohort of subjects with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed infection and historical controls derived from cohorts with high prevalence of viral coinfections and samples taken during prior flu seasons, we measured SARS-CoV-2 serological responses (both IgG and IgM) using commercially available assays. We ca</pubmed_abstract><journal>Open forum infectious diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Dynamic Change and Clinical Relevance of Postinfectious SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8083770</pmcid><funding_grant_id>20/COV/0305</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>666010</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Doran P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>All Ireland Infectious Diseases Cohort Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gavin P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambert J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leon AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feeney ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savinelli S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McNicholas B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelly C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGettrick P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGinty T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bracken T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inzitari R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whelan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eustace J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeBarra E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kenny G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yousif O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tinago W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sadlier C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cottere AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Courtney G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCann K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Low J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mallon PWG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horgan M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Dynamic Change and Clinical Relevance of Postinfectious SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although reports suggest that most individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop detectable antibodies postinfection, the kinetics, durability, and relative differences between immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses beyond the first few weeks after symptom onset remain poorly understood.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Within a large, well-phenotyped, diverse, prospective cohort of subjects with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed infection and historical controls derived from cohorts with high prevalence of viral coinfections and samples taken during prior flu seasons, we measured SARS-CoV-2 serological responses (both IgG and IgM) using commercially available assays. We ca</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-20T01:54:28.885Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T05:50:14.463Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8083770</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34377721</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofab122</doi></cross_references></HashMap>