<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>479(4)</volume><submitter>Won SH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Short-length stems were developed to reduce bone loss of the proximal femur and potentially decrease the incidence of thigh pain after cementless THA. However, it remains unknown whether short stems indeed reduce bone loss or the frequency of thigh pain.&lt;h4>Questions/purposes&lt;/h4>Is there a difference between short- and standard-length stems in terms of: (1) the frequency or severity of thigh pain, (2) modified Harris hip scores, (3) implant loosening, or (4) bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2013 and January 2014, three surgeons performed 205 primary THAs. To be eligible, patients needed to be at least 20 years of age, have not undergone previous history of hip surgery, and have no metabolic bone disease. </pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</journal><pagination>767-777</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8083837</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8083837</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ha YC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee YK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koo KH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Won SH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Short-length stems were developed to reduce bone loss of the proximal femur and potentially decrease the incidence of thigh pain after cementless THA. However, it remains unknown whether short stems indeed reduce bone loss or the frequency of thigh pain.&lt;h4>Questions/purposes&lt;/h4>Is there a difference between short- and standard-length stems in terms of: (1) the frequency or severity of thigh pain, (2) modified Harris hip scores, (3) implant loosening, or (4) bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between March 2013 and January 2014, three surgeons performed 205 primary THAs. To be eligible, patients needed to be at least 20 years of age, have not undergone previous history of hip surgery, and have no metabolic bone disease. </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:02:59.568Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:02:59.568Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8083837</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33009239</pubmed><doi>10.1097/corr.0000000000001505</doi><doi>10.1097/CORR.0000000000001505</doi></cross_references></HashMap>