<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><submitter>Zhou Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Currently, there are no studies on changes in the incidence of uterine rupture or maternal and foetal outcomes in women with uterine rupture during different birth policy periods in China. Moreover, the results of association studies of maternal age, parity and previous caesarean section number with the risk of maternal and foetal outcomes in women with uterine rupture have not been consistent. This research aims to conduct and discuss the above two aspects.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We included singleton pregnant women with no maternal complications other than uterine rupture from January 2012 to June 2019 in China's National Maternal Near Miss Surveillance System. The data in this study did not differentiate between complete and partial uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence. Thr</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC pregnancy and childbirth</journal><pagination>360</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8098017</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The incidence, risk factors and maternal and foetal outcomes of uterine rupture during different birth policy periods: an observational study in China.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8098017</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The incidence, risk factors and maternal and foetal outcomes of uterine rupture during different birth policy periods: an observational study in China.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Currently, there are no studies on changes in the incidence of uterine rupture or maternal and foetal outcomes in women with uterine rupture during different birth policy periods in China. Moreover, the results of association studies of maternal age, parity and previous caesarean section number with the risk of maternal and foetal outcomes in women with uterine rupture have not been consistent. This research aims to conduct and discuss the above two aspects.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We included singleton pregnant women with no maternal complications other than uterine rupture from January 2012 to June 2019 in China's National Maternal Near Miss Surveillance System. The data in this study did not differentiate between complete and partial uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence. Thr</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-21T18:27:04.617Z</modification><creation>2022-02-10T09:33:43.452Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8098017</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33952183</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12884-021-03811-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>