<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kelly JT</submitter><funding>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</funding><funding>Intramural EPA</funding><pagination>110432</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8102649</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>196</volume><pubmed_abstract>Epidemiologic studies have found associations between fine particulate matter (PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub>) exposure and adverse health effects using exposure models that incorporate monitoring data and other relevant information. Here, we use nine PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentration models (i.e., exposure models) that span a wide range of methods to investigate i) PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations in 2011, ii) potential changes in PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations between 2011 and 2028 due to on-the-books regulations, and iii) PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> exposure for the U.S. population and four racial/ethnic groups. The exposure models included two geophysical chemical transport models (CTMs), two interpolation methods, a satellite-derived aerosol optical depth-based method, a Bayesian statistical regression model, an</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental research</journal><pubmed_title>Examining PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations and exposure using multiple models.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8102649</pmcid><funding_grant_id>EPA999999</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin RV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bell ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Timin B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Donkelaar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelly JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwartz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berrocal V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Examining PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations and exposure using multiple models.</name><description>Epidemiologic studies have found associations between fine particulate matter (PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub>) exposure and adverse health effects using exposure models that incorporate monitoring data and other relevant information. Here, we use nine PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentration models (i.e., exposure models) that span a wide range of methods to investigate i) PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations in 2011, ii) potential changes in PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> concentrations between 2011 and 2028 due to on-the-books regulations, and iii) PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> exposure for the U.S. population and four racial/ethnic groups. The exposure models included two geophysical chemical transport models (CTMs), two interpolation methods, a satellite-derived aerosol optical depth-based method, a Bayesian statistical regression model, an</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-27T01:39:05.429Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T18:20:34.699Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8102649</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33166538</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2020.110432</doi></cross_references></HashMap>