{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Codipilly DC"],"funding":["NCI NIH HHS","National Institutes of Health"],"pagination":["65-73.e1"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8128933"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["20(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background & aims</h4>Endoscopic resection is an important component of the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic resection can be performed by cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We compared the histologic outcomes of ESD vs cEMR, followed by ablation.<h4>Methods</h4>We queried a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing cEMR and ESD followed by ablation at our institution from January 2006 to March 2020 and abstracted relevant demographic and clinical data. Our primary outcomes included the rate of complete remission of dysplasia (CRD): absence of dysplasia on surveillance histology, and complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM): ab"],"journal":["Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association"],"pubmed_title":["Comparative Outcomes of Cap Assisted Endoscopic Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus."],"pmcid":["PMC8128933"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 CA241164"],"pubmed_authors":["Codipilly DC","Lansing RM","Johnson ML","Oberoi M","Harmsen WS","Gandhi P","Wang KK","Dhaliwal L","Iyer PG"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Comparative Outcomes of Cap Assisted Endoscopic Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.","description":"<h4>Background & aims</h4>Endoscopic resection is an important component of the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic resection can be performed by cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We compared the histologic outcomes of ESD vs cEMR, followed by ablation.<h4>Methods</h4>We queried a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing cEMR and ESD followed by ablation at our institution from January 2006 to March 2020 and abstracted relevant demographic and clinical data. Our primary outcomes included the rate of complete remission of dysplasia (CRD): absence of dysplasia on surveillance histology, and complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM): ab","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Jan","modification":"2025-04-19T04:22:33.55Z","creation":"2025-04-19T04:22:33.55Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8128933","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33220523"],"doi":["10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.017"]}}