<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Khaki AR</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>464-472</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8169524</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in the first-line (1L) setting for cisplatin-unfit patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-high tumors or for platinum (cisplatin/carboplatin)-unfit patients, response rates remain modest and outcomes vary with no clinically useful biomarkers (except for PD-L1).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in patients receiving 1L ICIs for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) in a multicenter cohort study.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Patients treated with 1L ICIs for aUC across 24 institutions and five countries (in the USA and Europe) outside clinical trials were included in this study.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>We used a stepwise, hypo</pubmed_abstract><journal>European urology oncology</journal><pubmed_title>A New Prognostic Model in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8169524</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 CA009515</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PS3416</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001863</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002319</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Agarwal N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lythgoe MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu EY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alva A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zakharia Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santos V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zakopoulou R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drakaki A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grivas P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carril-Ajuria L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Kouchkovsky I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellano D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gartrell BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murgic J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tripathi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isaacsson Velho P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joshi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyman GH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frobe A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moses M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morales-Barrera R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koshkin V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jain J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hahn N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alonso Buznego L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diamantopoulos LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galsky MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bilen MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bamias A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sonpavde G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barata P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khaki AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriguez-Vida A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duran I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinato DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sankin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoimes CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shreck E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shankaran V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Devitt M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A New Prognostic Model in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in the first-line (1L) setting for cisplatin-unfit patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-high tumors or for platinum (cisplatin/carboplatin)-unfit patients, response rates remain modest and outcomes vary with no clinically useful biomarkers (except for PD-L1).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in patients receiving 1L ICIs for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) in a multicenter cohort study.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Patients treated with 1L ICIs for aUC across 24 institutions and five countries (in the USA and Europe) outside clinical trials were included in this study.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>We used a stepwise, hypo</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:15:40.678Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T20:15:40.678Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8169524</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33423945</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.006</doi></cross_references></HashMap>