<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Irish JD</submitter><funding>Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences</funding><funding>American Museum of Natural History</funding><funding>Bioanthropology Foundation</funding><funding>Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale</funding><funding>Universities of Padova, Milano and Parma</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>20210969</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8187995</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>288(1952)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Some researchers posit population continuity between Late Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers of the late Pleistocene and Holocene agriculturalists from Lower (northern) Nubia, in northeast Africa. Substantial craniodental differences in these time-successive groups are suggested to result from &lt;i>in situ&lt;/i> evolution. Specifically, these populations are considered a model example for subsistence-related selection worldwide in the transition to agriculture. Others question continuity, with findings indicating that the largely homogeneous Holocene populations differ significantly from late Pleistocene Lower Nubians. If the latter are representative of the local populace, post-Pleistocene discontinuity is implied. So who was ancestral to the Holocene agriculturalists? Dental morphological analyse</pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings. Biological sciences</journal><pubmed_title>The transition from hunting-gathering to agriculture in Nubia: dental evidence for and against selection, population continuity and discontinuity.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8187995</pmcid><funding_grant_id>BNS-9013942</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BNS-0104731</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Usai D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Irish JD</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The transition from hunting-gathering to agriculture in Nubia: dental evidence for and against selection, population continuity and discontinuity.</name><description>Some researchers posit population continuity between Late Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers of the late Pleistocene and Holocene agriculturalists from Lower (northern) Nubia, in northeast Africa. Substantial craniodental differences in these time-successive groups are suggested to result from &lt;i>in situ&lt;/i> evolution. Specifically, these populations are considered a model example for subsistence-related selection worldwide in the transition to agriculture. Others question continuity, with findings indicating that the largely homogeneous Holocene populations differ significantly from late Pleistocene Lower Nubians. If the latter are representative of the local populace, post-Pleistocene discontinuity is implied. So who was ancestral to the Holocene agriculturalists? Dental morphological analyse</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T21:53:49.659Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T03:54:05.641Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8187995</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34102887</pubmed><doi>10.1098/rspb.2021.0969</doi></cross_references></HashMap>