<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Vilakati S</submitter><funding>Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>Horchow Family Fund</funding><pagination>e005021</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8246301</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>To reduce malaria transmission in very low-endemic settings, screening and treatment near index cases (reactive case detection (RACD)), is widely practised, but the rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used miss low-density infections. Reactive focal mass drug administration (rfMDA) may be safe and more effective.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in Eswatini, a very low-endemic setting. 77 clusters were randomised to rfMDA using dihydroartemisin-piperaquine (DP) or RACD involving RDTs and artemether-lumefantrine. Interventions were delivered by the local programme. An intention-to-treat analysis was used to compare cluster-level cumulative confirmed malaria incidence among clusters with cases. Secondary outcomes included safety and a</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ global health</journal><pubmed_title>Effectiveness and safety of reactive focal mass drug administration (rfMDA) using dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to reduce malaria transmission in the very low-endemic setting of Eswatini: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8246301</pmcid><funding_grant_id>5300375400</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>A122394</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 AI144048</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kunene S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gosling R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nhlabathi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dufour MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalungero M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Helb D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pindolia D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ntshalintshali N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tesfa G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prach LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenhouse B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsiang MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benjamin-Chung J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhangu K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malambe C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dlamini B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vilakati S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dlamini N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whittemore B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baltzell K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mngadi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maphalala G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness and safety of reactive focal mass drug administration (rfMDA) using dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to reduce malaria transmission in the very low-endemic setting of Eswatini: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>To reduce malaria transmission in very low-endemic settings, screening and treatment near index cases (reactive case detection (RACD)), is widely practised, but the rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used miss low-density infections. Reactive focal mass drug administration (rfMDA) may be safe and more effective.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in Eswatini, a very low-endemic setting. 77 clusters were randomised to rfMDA using dihydroartemisin-piperaquine (DP) or RACD involving RDTs and artemether-lumefantrine. Interventions were delivered by the local programme. An intention-to-treat analysis was used to compare cluster-level cumulative confirmed malaria incidence among clusters with cases. Secondary outcomes included safety and a</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jun</publication><modification>2026-07-16T09:39:05.847Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:46:48.247Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8246301</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34193475</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005021</doi></cross_references></HashMap>