<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Riar S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In Canada, decisions regarding osteoporosis pharmacotherapy are based on estimated 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture. We aimed to determine how frequently 2 common approaches (Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada [CAROC] tool and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX]) produced different estimates and to seek possible explanations for differences.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a cross-sectional chart review at a tertiary osteoporosis centre (Dr. David Hanley Osteoporosis Centre in Calgary). Included patients were women referred for consideration of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy who attended a consultation between 2016 and 2019 and whose charts contained 10-year osteoporotic fracture risk estimates using both the CAROC tool (based on bone mineral de</pubmed_abstract><journal>CMAJ open</journal><pagination>E711-E717</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8248580</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of 2 fracture risk estimation processes in Alberta: a cross-sectional chart review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8248580</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Frohlich D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Billington EO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feasel AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Symonds CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aghajafari F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kline GA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of 2 fracture risk estimation processes in Alberta: a cross-sectional chart review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In Canada, decisions regarding osteoporosis pharmacotherapy are based on estimated 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture. We aimed to determine how frequently 2 common approaches (Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada [CAROC] tool and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX]) produced different estimates and to seek possible explanations for differences.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a cross-sectional chart review at a tertiary osteoporosis centre (Dr. David Hanley Osteoporosis Centre in Calgary). Included patients were women referred for consideration of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy who attended a consultation between 2016 and 2019 and whose charts contained 10-year osteoporotic fracture risk estimates using both the CAROC tool (based on bone mineral de</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr-Jun</publication><modification>2026-07-16T12:55:42.917Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:56:24.795Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8248580</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34162663</pubmed><doi>10.9778/cmajo.20200207</doi></cross_references></HashMap>