<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kishan AU</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e2115312</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8251338</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(7)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>The optimal management strategy for high-risk prostate cancer and additional adverse clinicopathologic features remains unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes among patients with high-risk prostate cancer after definitive treatment.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This retrospective cohort study included patients with high-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]) and at least 1 adverse clinicopathologic feature (defined as any primary Gleason pattern 5 on biopsy, clinical T3b-4 disease, ≥50% cores with biopsy results positive for prostate cancer, or NCCN ≥2 high-risk features) treated between 2000 and 2014 at 16 tertiary centers. Data were analyzed in November 2020.&lt;h4>Exposures&lt;/h4>Radical prostatecto</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of Multimodal Therapies and Outcomes Among Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Adverse Clinicopathologic Features.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8251338</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P50 CA211015</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Horwitz EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dess RT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moran BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhat P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krauss DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ross AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Juarez JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwen Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klein EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reddy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huland H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alam R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tilki D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karnes RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kupelian PA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Demanes DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song DY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tendulkar RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciezki JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tosoian JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chong N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pilar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiano R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Amico AV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Motterle G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deville C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kishan AU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steinberg ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elashoff D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levin-Epstein R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pisansky TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braccioforte M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McNutt T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wedde TB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rettig MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romero T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spratt DE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tran PT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez-Monge R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merrick GS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tward JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeWeese TL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abu-Isa EI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berlin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stish BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reiter RE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nickols NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trock BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boutros PC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greco S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shabsovich D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stock RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lilleby WA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of Multimodal Therapies and Outcomes Among Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Adverse Clinicopathologic Features.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>The optimal management strategy for high-risk prostate cancer and additional adverse clinicopathologic features remains unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes among patients with high-risk prostate cancer after definitive treatment.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This retrospective cohort study included patients with high-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]) and at least 1 adverse clinicopathologic feature (defined as any primary Gleason pattern 5 on biopsy, clinical T3b-4 disease, ≥50% cores with biopsy results positive for prostate cancer, or NCCN ≥2 high-risk features) treated between 2000 and 2014 at 16 tertiary centers. Data were analyzed in November 2020.&lt;h4>Exposures&lt;/h4>Radical prostatecto</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jul</publication><modification>2025-05-18T11:05:01.782Z</modification><creation>2025-05-18T11:05:01.782Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8251338</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34196715</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15312</doi></cross_references></HashMap>