<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sitlani CM</submitter><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>American Diabetes Association</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>1371-1383</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8283209</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(15)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Genome-wide association studies have been successful mapping loci for individual phenotypes, but few studies have comprehensively interrogated evidence of shared genetic effects across multiple phenotypes simultaneously. Statistical methods have been proposed for analyzing multiple phenotypes using summary statistics, which enables studies of shared genetic effects while avoiding challenges associated with individual-level data sharing. Adaptive tests have been developed to maintain power against multiple alternative hypotheses because the most powerful single-alternative test depends on the underlying structure of the associations between the multiple phenotypes and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Here we compare the performance of six such adaptive tests: two adaptive sum of powe</pubmed_abstract><journal>Human molecular genetics</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of adaptive multiple phenotype association tests using summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8283209</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32HL129982</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HG007416</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL134894</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HL129982</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL134894</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32HL007055</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 ES020836</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01HG007416</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL142825</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#1-19-PDF-045</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01ES020836</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL142825</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HL007055</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Avery CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sitlani CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baldassari AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McKnight B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hodonsky CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Highland HM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of adaptive multiple phenotype association tests using summary statistics in genome-wide association studies.</name><description>Genome-wide association studies have been successful mapping loci for individual phenotypes, but few studies have comprehensively interrogated evidence of shared genetic effects across multiple phenotypes simultaneously. Statistical methods have been proposed for analyzing multiple phenotypes using summary statistics, which enables studies of shared genetic effects while avoiding challenges associated with individual-level data sharing. Adaptive tests have been developed to maintain power against multiple alternative hypotheses because the most powerful single-alternative test depends on the underlying structure of the associations between the multiple phenotypes and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Here we compare the performance of six such adaptive tests: two adaptive sum of powe</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jul</publication><modification>2026-05-30T15:26:04.24Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T10:01:47.771Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8283209</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33949650</pubmed><doi>10.1093/hmg/ddab126</doi></cross_references></HashMap>