<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ribeiro Guerra M</submitter><funding>Ligue Contre le Cancer</funding><funding>the comprehensive cancer center SiRIC</funding><funding>Brazilian National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education - CAPES</funding><funding>Institut National Du Cancer</funding><funding>Brazilian National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education – CAPES</funding><pagination>79</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8336294</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested fo</pubmed_abstract><journal>Breast cancer research : BCR</journal><pubmed_title>Diagnostic chest X-rays and breast cancer risk among women with a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer unexplained by a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8336294</pmcid><funding_grant_id>BEX 5852/15-3</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>INCa-DGOS-4654</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PRE11/NA</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PRE05/DSL</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>b2008-029/LL-LC</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PRE07/DSL</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bignon YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cavaciuti E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lesueur F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lasset C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pujol P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Audebert-Bellanger S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lejeune-Dumoulin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soubrier F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maugard CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonadona V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coignard J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gladieff L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrieu N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dreyfus H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fert-Ferrer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berthet P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delnatte C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gesta P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tardivon A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiesa J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nogues C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazoyer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caron O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Floquet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giraud S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ribeiro Guerra M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faivre L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Longy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dondon MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lortholary A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beauvallet J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mortemousque I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fajac A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frebourg T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Gal D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venat-Bouvet L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mebirouk N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fricker JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luporsi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coupier I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tinat J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eisinger F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adenis-Lavignasse C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Belotti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barjhoux L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Damiola F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eon-Marchais S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stoppa-Lyonnet D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buecher B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Limacher JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colas C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gauthier-Villars M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Diagnostic chest X-rays and breast cancer risk among women with a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer unexplained by a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested fo</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-19T00:30:01.467Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T04:14:50.229Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8336294</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34344426</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13058-021-01456-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>