<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Mason D</submitter><funding>Economic and Social Research Council</funding><funding>King&amp;apos;s College London</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><pagination>3165-3179</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8349337</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>51(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Longitudinal studies have generally reported poor outcomes in adulthood for the majority of individuals (c.50-60%) with autism. Several factors putatively predict outcome (e.g. IQ), but findings remain mixed. This paper presents an updated meta-analysis of autism outcome studies and extends previous findings with additional analyses (including meta-regression). A total of 4088 records was screened and 18 studies, involving 1199 individuals, were included in the quantitative analysis. Estimated percentages indicated that 20.0% of participants were rated as having a good outcome, 26.6% a fair outcome, and 49.3% a poor outcome. Meta-regression indicated that lower IQ in adulthood was predictive of poor outcome; other meta-regression models did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</journal><pubmed_title>A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies of Autistic Adults: Quantifying Effect Size, Quality, and Meta-regression.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8349337</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2106586</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Glaser K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Happe F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kempton MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mason D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Capp SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howlin P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies of Autistic Adults: Quantifying Effect Size, Quality, and Meta-regression.</name><description>Longitudinal studies have generally reported poor outcomes in adulthood for the majority of individuals (c.50-60%) with autism. Several factors putatively predict outcome (e.g. IQ), but findings remain mixed. This paper presents an updated meta-analysis of autism outcome studies and extends previous findings with additional analyses (including meta-regression). A total of 4088 records was screened and 18 studies, involving 1199 individuals, were included in the quantitative analysis. Estimated percentages indicated that 20.0% of participants were rated as having a good outcome, 26.6% a fair outcome, and 49.3% a poor outcome. Meta-regression indicated that lower IQ in adulthood was predictive of poor outcome; other meta-regression models did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Sep</publication><modification>2026-07-16T09:13:20.864Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:52:12.694Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8349337</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33200352</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10803-020-04763-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>