{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Giugale LE"],"funding":["NCATS NIH HHS"],"pagination":["435-442"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8376791"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["138(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To compare prolapse recurrence after total vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension to recurrence after supracervical hysterectomy with mesh sacrocervicopexy for the primary management of uterovaginal prolapse.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing uterovaginal prolapse repair at an academic center from 2009 to 2019. Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with mesh sacrocervicopexy were included. The primary outcome was composite prolapse recurrence (prolapse beyond the hymen or retreatment with pessary or surgery). Secondary outcomes included mesh complications, time to recurrence, and overall reoperation for either prolapse recurrence"],"journal":["Obstetrics and gynecology"],"pubmed_title":["Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse."],"pmcid":["PMC8376791"],"funding_grant_id":["UL1 TR001857"],"pubmed_authors":["Melnyk AI","Ruppert KM","Giugale LE","Bradley MS","Napoe GS","Lavelle ES"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To compare prolapse recurrence after total vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension to recurrence after supracervical hysterectomy with mesh sacrocervicopexy for the primary management of uterovaginal prolapse.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing uterovaginal prolapse repair at an academic center from 2009 to 2019. Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with mesh sacrocervicopexy were included. The primary outcome was composite prolapse recurrence (prolapse beyond the hymen or retreatment with pessary or surgery). Secondary outcomes included mesh complications, time to recurrence, and overall reoperation for either prolapse recurrence","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Sep","modification":"2025-04-04T21:52:33.769Z","creation":"2025-04-04T21:52:33.769Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8376791","cross_references":{"pubmed":["34352830"],"doi":["10.1097/AOG.0000000000004484","10.1097/aog.0000000000004484"]}}