{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Yang Z"],"funding":["National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","NHLBI NIH HHS"],"pagination":["3101-3111"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8390571"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["21(9)"],"pubmed_abstract":["The new lung allocation policy has led to an increase in distant donors and consequently enhanced logistical burden of procuring organs. Though early single-center studies noted similar outcomes between same-team transplantation (ST, procuring team from transplanting center) and different-team transplantation (DT, procuring team from different center), the efficacy of DT in the contemporary era remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the trend of DT, rate of transplanting both donor lungs, 1-year graft survival, and risk of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) database from 2006 to 2018. A total of 21619 patients (DT 2085, 9.7%) with 19837 donors were included. Utilization of DT decreased from 15.9% in 2006 to 8.5% in 201"],"journal":["American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons"],"pubmed_title":["Different-team procurements: A potential solution for the unintended consequences of change in lung allocation policy."],"pmcid":["PMC8390571"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 HL146856","R01HL146856‐01A1","R01HL146856-01A1"],"pubmed_authors":["Nava RG","Shepherd HM","Byers DE","Hachem RR","Pasque MK","Kreisel D","Yan Y","Meyers BF","Gerull WD","Witt CA","Marklin GF","Kozower BD","Yang Z","Takahashi T","Patterson GA","Puri V","Vazquez Guillamet R"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Different-team procurements: A potential solution for the unintended consequences of change in lung allocation policy.","description":"The new lung allocation policy has led to an increase in distant donors and consequently enhanced logistical burden of procuring organs. Though early single-center studies noted similar outcomes between same-team transplantation (ST, procuring team from transplanting center) and different-team transplantation (DT, procuring team from different center), the efficacy of DT in the contemporary era remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the trend of DT, rate of transplanting both donor lungs, 1-year graft survival, and risk of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) database from 2006 to 2018. A total of 21619 patients (DT 2085, 9.7%) with 19837 donors were included. Utilization of DT decreased from 15.9% in 2006 to 8.5% in 201","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Sep","modification":"2025-04-04T09:37:29.839Z","creation":"2025-04-04T09:37:29.839Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8390571","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33638937"],"doi":["10.1111/ajt.16553"]}}