<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Das R</submitter><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>886-897</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8407441</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>The assessment of therapeutic response after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been an ongoing challenge. Several limitations have been encountered when employing current grading systems for residual tumor. Considering endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a sensitive imaging technique for PDAC, differences in tumor size between preoperative EUS and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant therapy were hypothesized to represent an improved marker of treatment response.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>For 340 treatment-naïve and 365 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs, EUS and pathologic findings were analyzed and correlated with patient overall survival (OS). A separate group of 200 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs served as a validation coh</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association</journal><pubmed_title>Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8407441</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 DK120531</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 GM104942</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Uttam S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paniccia A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ongchin MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bahary N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Das R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGrath K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pingpank JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khalid A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohori NP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shyu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henn P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hogg ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dasyam AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gorantla VC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomas R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeh HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rhee JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brand RE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zureikat AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chennat JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slivka A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarkaria S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boone BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ellsworth S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Landau MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Theisen BK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seiser N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singhi AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee KK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fasanella KE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Tumor Size Differences Between Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound and Postoperative Pathology for Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Predict Patient Outcome.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>The assessment of therapeutic response after neoadjuvant treatment and pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been an ongoing challenge. Several limitations have been encountered when employing current grading systems for residual tumor. Considering endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) represents a sensitive imaging technique for PDAC, differences in tumor size between preoperative EUS and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant therapy were hypothesized to represent an improved marker of treatment response.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>For 340 treatment-naïve and 365 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs, EUS and pathologic findings were analyzed and correlated with patient overall survival (OS). A separate group of 200 neoadjuvant-treated PDACs served as a validation coh</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-22T11:54:30.991Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:06:21.833Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8407441</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33278573</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.041</doi></cross_references></HashMap>