{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Veroniki AA"],"funding":["Swiss National Science Foundation"],"pagination":["246"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8434710"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["10(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis (NMA) published in 2015 promotes comprehensive reporting in published systematic reviews with NMA. PRISMA-NMA includes 32 items: 27 core items as indicated in the 2009 PRISMA Statement and five items specific to the reporting of NMAs. Although NMA reporting is improving, it is unclear whether PRISMA-NMA has accelerated this improvement. We aimed to investigate the impact of PRISMA-NMA and highlight key items that require attention and improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>We updated our previous collection of NMAs with articles published between April 2015 and July 2018. We assessed the completeness of reporting for each NMA, including main manuscript and o"],"journal":["Systematic reviews"],"pubmed_title":["Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC8434710"],"funding_grant_id":["320030","179158"],"pubmed_authors":["Tricco AC","Tsokani S","Papakonstantinou T","Salanti G","Veroniki AA","Mavridis D","Pagkalidou I","Chaimani A","Straus SE","Kontouli KM","Lunny C","Ambarcioglu P","Zevgiti S","Hutton B","Nikolakopoulou A","Pandis N"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis (NMA) published in 2015 promotes comprehensive reporting in published systematic reviews with NMA. PRISMA-NMA includes 32 items: 27 core items as indicated in the 2009 PRISMA Statement and five items specific to the reporting of NMAs. Although NMA reporting is improving, it is unclear whether PRISMA-NMA has accelerated this improvement. We aimed to investigate the impact of PRISMA-NMA and highlight key items that require attention and improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>We updated our previous collection of NMAs with articles published between April 2015 and July 2018. We assessed the completeness of reporting for each NMA, including main manuscript and o","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Sep","modification":"2026-05-09T04:41:15.493Z","creation":"2022-02-11T10:54:16.861Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8434710","cross_references":{"pubmed":["34507621"],"doi":["10.1186/s13643-021-01780-9"]}}