<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>156(12)</volume><submitter>Bowyer MW</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Sustainment of comprehensive procedural skills in trauma surgery is a particular problem for surgeons in rural, global, and combat settings. Trauma care often requires open surgical procedures for low-frequency/high-risk injuries at a time when open surgical experience is declining in general and trauma surgery training.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether general surgeons participating in a 2-day standardized trauma skills course demonstrate measurable improvement in accuracy and independent performance of specific trauma skills.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>General surgeons in active surgical practice were enrolled from a simulation center with anatomic laboratory from October 2019 to October 2020. Differences in pretraining/training and posttraining performance outcomes were examined using (1) pretraining/posttraining surveys, (2) pretraining/posttraining knowledge assessment, and (3) training/posttraining faculty assessment. Analysis took place in November 2020.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>A 2-day standardized, immersive, cadaver-based skills course, developed with best practices in instructional design, that teaches and assesses 24 trauma surgical procedures was used.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Trauma surgery capability, as measured by confidence, knowledge, abilities, and independent performance of specific trauma surgical procedures; 3-month posttraining skill transfer.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The study cohort included 65 active-duty general surgeons, of which 16 (25%) were women and 49 (75%) were men. The mean (SD) age was 38.5 (4.2) years. Before and during training, 1 of 65 participants (1%) were able to accurately perform all 24 procedures without guidance. After course training, 64 participants (99%) met the benchmark performance requirements for the 24 trauma procedures, and 51 (78%) were able to perform them without guidance. Procedural confidence and knowledge increased significantly from before to after the course. At 3 months after training, 37 participants (56%) reported skill transfer to trauma or other procedures.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>In this study, direct measurement of procedural performance following standardized training demonstrated significant improvement in skill performance in a broad array of trauma procedures. This model may be useful for assessment of procedural competence in other specialties.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA surgery</journal><pagination>1103-1109</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8444063</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A Novel Paradigm for Surgical Skills Training and Assessment of Competency.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8444063</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Armstrong JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bowyer MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elster EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andreatta PB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Remick KN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Novel Paradigm for Surgical Skills Training and Assessment of Competency.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Sustainment of comprehensive procedural skills in trauma surgery is a particular problem for surgeons in rural, global, and combat settings. Trauma care often requires open surgical procedures for low-frequency/high-risk injuries at a time when open surgical experience is declining in general and trauma surgery training.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether general surgeons participating in a 2-day standardized trauma skills course demonstrate measurable improvement in accuracy and independent performance of specific trauma skills.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>General surgeons in active surgical practice were enrolled from a simulation center with anatomic laboratory from October 2019 to October 2020. Differences in pretraining/training and posttraining performance outcomes were examined using (1) pretraining/posttraining surveys, (2) pretraining/posttraining knowledge assessment, and (3) training/posttraining faculty assessment. Analysis took place in November 2020.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>A 2-day standardized, immersive, cadaver-based skills course, developed with best practices in instructional design, that teaches and assesses 24 trauma surgical procedures was used.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>Trauma surgery capability, as measured by confidence, knowledge, abilities, and independent performance of specific trauma surgical procedures; 3-month posttraining skill transfer.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The study cohort included 65 active-duty general surgeons, of which 16 (25%) were women and 49 (75%) were men. The mean (SD) age was 38.5 (4.2) years. Before and during training, 1 of 65 participants (1%) were able to accurately perform all 24 procedures without guidance. After course training, 64 participants (99%) met the benchmark performance requirements for the 24 trauma procedures, and 51 (78%) were able to perform them without guidance. Procedural confidence and knowledge increased significantly from before to after the course. At 3 months after training, 37 participants (56%) reported skill transfer to trauma or other procedures.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>In this study, direct measurement of procedural performance following standardized training demonstrated significant improvement in skill performance in a broad array of trauma procedures. This model may be useful for assessment of procedural competence in other specialties.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-22T21:12:40.015Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T03:28:01.513Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8444063</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34524418</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4412</doi></cross_references></HashMap>