<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>204(Pt B)</volume><submitter>Kumar M</submitter><funding>UK-India Education and Research Initiative</funding><funding>UNICEF</funding><pubmed_abstract>COVID-19 positive patients can egest live SARS-CoV-2 virus and viral genome fragments through faecal matter and urine, raising concerns about viral transmission through the faecal-oral route and/or contaminated aerosolized water. These concerns are amplified in many low- and middle-income countries, where raw sewage is often discharged into surface waterways and open defecation is common. Nonetheless, there has been no evidence of COVID-19 transmission via ambient urban water, and the virus viability in such aquatic matrices is believed to be minimal and not a matter of concern. In this manuscript, we attempt to discern the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material (ORF-1ab, N and S genes) in the urban water (lakes, rivers, and drains) of the two Indian cities viz., Ahmedabad (AMD), in western India with 9 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and Guwahati (GHY), in the north-east of the country with no such treatment facilities. The present study was carried out to establish the applicability of environmental water surveillance (E-wat-Surveillance) of COVID-19 as a potential tool for public health monitoring at the community level. 25.8% and 20% of the urban water samples had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA load in AMD and GHY, respectively. N-gene > S-gene > ORF-1ab-gene were readily detected in the urban surface water of AMD, whereas no such observable trend was noticed in the case of GHY. The high concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 genes (e.g., ORF-1ab; 800 copies/L for Sabarmati River, AMD and S-gene; 565 copies/L for Bharalu urban river, GHY) found in urban waters suggest that WWTPs do not always completely remove the virus genetic material and that E-wat-Surveillance of COVID-19 in cities/rural areas with poor sanitation is possible.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental research</journal><pagination>112067</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8445884</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Spectre of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the ambient urban waters of Ahmedabad and Guwahati: A tale of two Indian cities.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8445884</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Joshi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gupta S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mutiyar PK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Srivastava V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goswami R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dave S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahanta C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazumder P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramanathan AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deka JP</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Spectre of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the ambient urban waters of Ahmedabad and Guwahati: A tale of two Indian cities.</name><description>COVID-19 positive patients can egest live SARS-CoV-2 virus and viral genome fragments through faecal matter and urine, raising concerns about viral transmission through the faecal-oral route and/or contaminated aerosolized water. These concerns are amplified in many low- and middle-income countries, where raw sewage is often discharged into surface waterways and open defecation is common. Nonetheless, there has been no evidence of COVID-19 transmission via ambient urban water, and the virus viability in such aquatic matrices is believed to be minimal and not a matter of concern. In this manuscript, we attempt to discern the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material (ORF-1ab, N and S genes) in the urban water (lakes, rivers, and drains) of the two Indian cities viz., Ahmedabad (AMD), in western India with 9 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and Guwahati (GHY), in the north-east of the country with no such treatment facilities. The present study was carried out to establish the applicability of environmental water surveillance (E-wat-Surveillance) of COVID-19 as a potential tool for public health monitoring at the community level. 25.8% and 20% of the urban water samples had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA load in AMD and GHY, respectively. N-gene > S-gene > ORF-1ab-gene were readily detected in the urban surface water of AMD, whereas no such observable trend was noticed in the case of GHY. The high concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 genes (e.g., ORF-1ab; 800 copies/L for Sabarmati River, AMD and S-gene; 565 copies/L for Bharalu urban river, GHY) found in urban waters suggest that WWTPs do not always completely remove the virus genetic material and that E-wat-Surveillance of COVID-19 in cities/rural areas with poor sanitation is possible.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Mar</publication><modification>2024-11-12T14:49:21.745Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T13:25:09.699Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8445884</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34543636</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2021.112067</doi></cross_references></HashMap>