{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Marchal S"],"funding":["Department of Clinical Research and Innovation of Nice University Hospital"],"pagination":["e046324"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8449968"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["11(9)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>Urinary tract infections occur in around 1%-4% of boys and 3%-8% of girls under 2 years old. Diagnosis is difficult because of non-specific symptoms and the risk of urine analysis contamination depending on the sampling method used for precontinent infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommend transurethral catheterisation and suprapubic aspiration because of a low contamination rate but these techniques are invasive. On the other hand, while the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocate clean catch urine for its minimal invasiveness and acceptable contamination rate, it is difficult to accomplish in precontinent infants. Two recent methods have been described: the Quick-Wee method by Kaufman <i>et al</i> (suprapubic stimulation with cold salin"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pubmed_title":["Quick-Wee versus bladder stimulation to collect midstream urine from precontinent infants under 1 year of age: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ES.Stimquick.U)."],"pmcid":["PMC8449968"],"funding_grant_id":["2020-A02303-36"],"pubmed_authors":["Freyssinet E","Demonchy D","Marchal S","Bernardor J","Herisse AL","Schori-Fortier C","Tran A","Desmontils J","Olla M","Fontas E","Donzeau D","Rancurel A","Haas H","Salicis J","Janicot J","Ribet C","Berard E","Breaud J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Quick-Wee versus bladder stimulation to collect midstream urine from precontinent infants under 1 year of age: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ES.Stimquick.U).","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>Urinary tract infections occur in around 1%-4% of boys and 3%-8% of girls under 2 years old. Diagnosis is difficult because of non-specific symptoms and the risk of urine analysis contamination depending on the sampling method used for precontinent infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommend transurethral catheterisation and suprapubic aspiration because of a low contamination rate but these techniques are invasive. On the other hand, while the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocate clean catch urine for its minimal invasiveness and acceptable contamination rate, it is difficult to accomplish in precontinent infants. Two recent methods have been described: the Quick-Wee method by Kaufman <i>et al</i> (suprapubic stimulation with cold salin","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Sep","modification":"2026-05-07T21:19:07.666Z","creation":"2022-02-11T11:46:21.672Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8449968","cross_references":{"pubmed":["34531206"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046324"]}}