<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(5)</volume><submitter>Moles RL</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Child Abuse Pediatrics is a small and geographically dispersed specialty. This article reports on an intervention to improve written and photodocumentation quality and uniformity in suspected child physical abuse cases, using a remote, de-identified case review system.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In each cycle, participants submitted de-identified medical reports and photographs for review by a child abuse pediatrics expert. Experts evaluated 3 cycles of 5 cases using a novel rubric and assigned quality interventions for the participants based on their scores.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>15 of 16 participants improved scores between cycles 1 and 3 (78% versus 89%, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001). All participants rated the program as helpful and would recommend it to a colleague.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>A quality improvement project administered via the internet improves the quality and uniformity of written and photographic documentation in child physical abuse evaluations.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Pediatric quality &amp; safety</journal><pagination>e477</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8476058</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Improving Physical Abuse Documentation and Photography through a Remote Peer Review Intervention.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8476058</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Martinez K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palusci V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Melville J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moles RL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Improving Physical Abuse Documentation and Photography through a Remote Peer Review Intervention.</name><description>Child Abuse Pediatrics is a small and geographically dispersed specialty. This article reports on an intervention to improve written and photodocumentation quality and uniformity in suspected child physical abuse cases, using a remote, de-identified case review system.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In each cycle, participants submitted de-identified medical reports and photographs for review by a child abuse pediatrics expert. Experts evaluated 3 cycles of 5 cases using a novel rubric and assigned quality interventions for the participants based on their scores.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>15 of 16 participants improved scores between cycles 1 and 3 (78% versus 89%, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001). All participants rated the program as helpful and would recommend it to a colleague.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>A quality improvement project administered via the internet improves the quality and uniformity of written and photographic documentation in child physical abuse evaluations.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Sep-Oct</publication><modification>2024-11-19T20:49:04.133Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T11:37:51.217Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8476058</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34589651</pubmed><doi>10.1097/pq9.0000000000000477</doi></cross_references></HashMap>