<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>141(11)</volume><submitter>Daniels AM</submitter><funding>Maastricht University</funding><funding>VieCuri Medisch Centrum</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of patient characteristics, bone mineral density (BMD), bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength with secondary displacement of a DRF based on radiographic alignment parameters.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Dorsal angulation, radial inclination and ulnar variance were assessed on conventional radiographs of a cohort of 251 patients, 38 men and 213 women, to determine the anatomic position of the DRF at presentation (primary position) and during follow-up. Secondary fracture displacement was assessed in the non-operatively treated patients (N = 154) with an acceptable position, preceded (N = 97) or not preceded (N = 57) by primary reduction (baseline position). Additionally, bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength at the contralateral distal radius and tibia were assessed by HR-pQCT in a subset of, respectively, 63 and 71 patients.&lt;h4>Outcome&lt;/h4>Characteristics of patients with and without secondary fracture displacement did not differ. In the model with adjustment for primary reduction [OR 22.00 (2.27-212.86), p = 0.008], total [OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.04-0.68), p = 0.013] and cortical [OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05-0.80], p = 0.024] volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cortical thickness [OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.74), p = 0.021] at the distal radius were associated with secondary DRF displacement. No associations were found for other patient characteristics, such as age gender, BMD or prevalent vertebral fractures.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In conclusion, our study indicates that besides primary reduction, cortical bone quality may be important for the risk of secondary displacement of DRFs.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</journal><pagination>1909-1918</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8497288</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Association of secondary displacement of distal radius fractures with cortical bone quality at the distal radius.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8497288</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Janzing HMJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wyers CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geusens PPMM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van den Bergh JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daniels AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poeze M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van der Velde RY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaarsemaker S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Rietbergen B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vranken L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Association of secondary displacement of distal radius fractures with cortical bone quality at the distal radius.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of patient characteristics, bone mineral density (BMD), bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength with secondary displacement of a DRF based on radiographic alignment parameters.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Dorsal angulation, radial inclination and ulnar variance were assessed on conventional radiographs of a cohort of 251 patients, 38 men and 213 women, to determine the anatomic position of the DRF at presentation (primary position) and during follow-up. Secondary fracture displacement was assessed in the non-operatively treated patients (N = 154) with an acceptable position, preceded (N = 97) or not preceded (N = 57) by primary reduction (baseline position). Additionally, bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength at the contralateral distal radius and tibia were assessed by HR-pQCT in a subset of, respectively, 63 and 71 patients.&lt;h4>Outcome&lt;/h4>Characteristics of patients with and without secondary fracture displacement did not differ. In the model with adjustment for primary reduction [OR 22.00 (2.27-212.86), p = 0.008], total [OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.04-0.68), p = 0.013] and cortical [OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05-0.80], p = 0.024] volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cortical thickness [OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.74), p = 0.021] at the distal radius were associated with secondary DRF displacement. No associations were found for other patient characteristics, such as age gender, BMD or prevalent vertebral fractures.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In conclusion, our study indicates that besides primary reduction, cortical bone quality may be important for the risk of secondary displacement of DRFs.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2025-05-18T12:31:28.381Z</modification><creation>2025-05-18T12:31:28.381Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8497288</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33128608</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00402-020-03658-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>