<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>35(11)</volume><submitter>Bachmann C</submitter><funding>Universitätsklinikum Tübingen</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Optimized drug delivery systems are needed for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to develop a technology for applying pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) under hyperthermic conditions (hPIPAC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This is an ex-vivo study in an inverted bovine urinary bladder (IBUB). Hyperthermia was established using a modified industry-standard device (Humigard). Two entry and one exit ports were placed. Warm-humid CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> was insufflated in the IBUB placed in a normothermic bath to simulate body thermal inertia. The temperature of the aerosol, tissue, and water bath was measured in real-time.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Therapeutic hyperthermia (target tissue temperature 41-43 °C) could be established and maintained over 30 min. In the first phase (insufflation phase), tissue hyperthermia was created by insufflating continuously warm-humid CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>. In the second phase (aerosolization phase), chemotherapeutic drugs were heated up and aerosolized into the IBUB. In a third phase (application phase), hyperthermia was maintained within the therapeutic range using an endoscopic infrared heating device. In a fourth phase, the toxic aerosol was discarded using a closed aerosol waste system (CAWS).&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>We introduce a simple and effective technology for hPIPAC. hPIPAC is feasible in an ex-vivo model by using a combination of industry-standard medical devices after modification. Potential pharmacological and biological advantages of hPIPAC over PIPAC should now be evaluated.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Surgical endoscopy</journal><pagination>6358-6365</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8523399</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Technology development of hyperthermic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (hPIPAC).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8523399</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Nadiradze G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weinreich FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reymond MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sautkin I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Archid R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Konigsrainer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bachmann C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Technology development of hyperthermic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (hPIPAC).</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Optimized drug delivery systems are needed for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to develop a technology for applying pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) under hyperthermic conditions (hPIPAC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This is an ex-vivo study in an inverted bovine urinary bladder (IBUB). Hyperthermia was established using a modified industry-standard device (Humigard). Two entry and one exit ports were placed. Warm-humid CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> was insufflated in the IBUB placed in a normothermic bath to simulate body thermal inertia. The temperature of the aerosol, tissue, and water bath was measured in real-time.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Therapeutic hyperthermia (target tissue temperature 41-43 °C) could be established and maintained over 30 min. In the first phase (insufflation phase), tissue hyperthermia was created by insufflating continuously warm-humid CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>. In the second phase (aerosolization phase), chemotherapeutic drugs were heated up and aerosolized into the IBUB. In a third phase (application phase), hyperthermia was maintained within the therapeutic range using an endoscopic infrared heating device. In a fourth phase, the toxic aerosol was discarded using a closed aerosol waste system (CAWS).&lt;h4>Discussion&lt;/h4>We introduce a simple and effective technology for hPIPAC. hPIPAC is feasible in an ex-vivo model by using a combination of industry-standard medical devices after modification. Potential pharmacological and biological advantages of hPIPAC over PIPAC should now be evaluated.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2025-05-18T12:31:25.113Z</modification><creation>2025-05-18T12:31:25.113Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8523399</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34114069</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08567-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>