{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Paik WH"],"funding":["National Research Foundation of Korea"],"pagination":["4662"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8540534"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["10(20)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as the primary modality for the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. The aim of this study is to determine whether technical factors including suction (S), non-suction (NS), capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull (CSSS), and the number of needle actuations (to-and-fro needle movements) may affect the accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid masses at facilities without on-site cytopathology.<h4>Methods</h4>The diagnostic yield of malignancy, blood contamination and cellularity at each sample acquired from EUS-FNA with or without S and different numbers of actuation (10, 15 and 20) were measured (study I). The optimal actuation number was determined and a head-to-head comparison trial between S and CSSS "],"journal":["Journal of clinical medicine"],"pubmed_title":["Optimal Techniques for EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Solid Masses at Facilities without On-Site Cytopathology: Results from Two Prospective Randomised Trials."],"pmcid":["PMC8540534"],"funding_grant_id":["2021R1A6A1A03040260"],"pubmed_authors":["Lee JB","Park Y","Choi JH","Park DH","Paik WH"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Optimal Techniques for EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Solid Masses at Facilities without On-Site Cytopathology: Results from Two Prospective Randomised Trials.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as the primary modality for the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. The aim of this study is to determine whether technical factors including suction (S), non-suction (NS), capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull (CSSS), and the number of needle actuations (to-and-fro needle movements) may affect the accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid masses at facilities without on-site cytopathology.<h4>Methods</h4>The diagnostic yield of malignancy, blood contamination and cellularity at each sample acquired from EUS-FNA with or without S and different numbers of actuation (10, 15 and 20) were measured (study I). The optimal actuation number was determined and a head-to-head comparison trial between S and CSSS ","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Oct","modification":"2026-06-15T03:19:15.514Z","creation":"2024-11-21T06:06:38.73Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8540534","cross_references":{"pubmed":["34682785"],"doi":["10.3390/jcm10204662"]}}