<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>71(9)</volume><submitter>Pallen MJ</submitter><funding>biotechnology and biological sciences research council</funding><funding>medical research council</funding><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</funding><pubmed_abstract>The status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> was introduced to bacterial taxonomy in the 1990s to accommodate uncultured taxa defined by analyses of DNA sequences. Here I review the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) associated with the status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> in the light of a quarter century of use, twinned with recent developments in bacterial taxonomy and sequence-based taxonomic discovery. Despite ambiguities as to its scope, philosophical objections to its use and practical problems in implementation, the status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> has now been applied to over 1000 taxa and has been widely adopted by journals and databases. Although lacking priority under the International Code for Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, many &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> names have already achieved &lt;i>de facto&lt;/i> sta</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8549269</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> for uncultured taxa of &lt;i>Bacteria&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Archaea&lt;/i>: SWOT analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8549269</pmcid><funding_grant_id>BBS/E/F/000PR10351</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/T030062/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BB/R012504/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BBS/E/F/00044414</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pallen MJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> for uncultured taxa of &lt;i>Bacteria&lt;/i> and &lt;i>Archaea&lt;/i>: SWOT analysis.</name><description>The status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> was introduced to bacterial taxonomy in the 1990s to accommodate uncultured taxa defined by analyses of DNA sequences. Here I review the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) associated with the status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> in the light of a quarter century of use, twinned with recent developments in bacterial taxonomy and sequence-based taxonomic discovery. Despite ambiguities as to its scope, philosophical objections to its use and practical problems in implementation, the status &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> has now been applied to over 1000 taxa and has been widely adopted by journals and databases. Although lacking priority under the International Code for Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, many &lt;i>Candidatus&lt;/i> names have already achieved &lt;i>de facto&lt;/i> sta</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-20T01:11:05.462Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:26:21.599Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8549269</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34516368</pubmed><doi>10.1099/ijsem.0.005000</doi></cross_references></HashMap>