<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>33</volume><submitter>Gomez Rivas J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The burden of urological diseases is rising as the worldwide population ages. Although specialist urological provision is needed, a large proportion of these conditions will be managed in primary care. The importance of including urology in medical education currently remains unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To provide recommendations on undergraduate medical education for urology in Europe.&lt;h4>Design setting and participants&lt;/h4>A three-round Delphi process to reach consensus on standardising the undergraduate urology curriculum in Europe was endorsed by the European School of Urology.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>The levels of agreement were set using a nine-point scale according to the GRADE grid: 1-3, disagree; 4-6, uncertain; and 7-9, agree. Consens</pubmed_abstract><journal>European urology open science</journal><pagination>72-80</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8551509</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Essentials for Standardising the Undergraduate Urology Curriculum in Europe: Outcomes of a Delphi Consensus from the European School of Urology.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8551509</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gomez Rivas J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Svihra J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silva-Ramos M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>a European School of Urology collaborative group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spivak L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marra G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palou J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alvarez-Maestro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuruk E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarikaya S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Poel H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liatsikos E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Banov P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Page T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanisavljevic R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Porpiglia F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henningsohn L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Somani B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriguez Socarras M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szendroi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Poppel H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>N'Dow J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giannakopoulos S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zondervan P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nebojsa B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pearce I</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Essentials for Standardising the Undergraduate Urology Curriculum in Europe: Outcomes of a Delphi Consensus from the European School of Urology.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The burden of urological diseases is rising as the worldwide population ages. Although specialist urological provision is needed, a large proportion of these conditions will be managed in primary care. The importance of including urology in medical education currently remains unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To provide recommendations on undergraduate medical education for urology in Europe.&lt;h4>Design setting and participants&lt;/h4>A three-round Delphi process to reach consensus on standardising the undergraduate urology curriculum in Europe was endorsed by the European School of Urology.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>The levels of agreement were set using a nine-point scale according to the GRADE grid: 1-3, disagree; 4-6, uncertain; and 7-9, agree. Consens</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T14:52:50.903Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T12:29:57.1Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8551509</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34738091</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.003</doi></cross_references></HashMap>