{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["11(10)"],"submitter":["Ioannidis JP"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate whether the COVID-19 experts who appear most frequently in media have high citation impact for their research overall, and for their COVID-19 peer-reviewed publications in particular and to examine the representation of women among such experts.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-linking of data sets of most highly visible COVID-19 media experts with citation data on the impact of their published work (career-long publication record and COVID-19-specific work).<h4>Setting</h4>Cable news appearance in prime-time programming or overall media appearances.<h4>Participants</h4>Most highly visible COVID-19 media experts in the USA, Switzerland, Greece and Denmark.<h4>Interventions</h4>None.<h4>Outcome measures</h4>Citation data from Scopus along with discipline-specific ranks of overall career-long and COVID-19-specific impact based on a previously validated composite citation indicator.<h4>Results</h4>We assessed 76 COVID-19 experts who were highly visible in US prime-time cable news, and 50, 12 and 2 highly visible experts in media in Denmark, Greece and Switzerland, respectively. Of those, 23/76, 10/50, 2/12 and 0/2 were among the top 2% of overall citation impact among scientists in the same discipline worldwide. Moreover, 37/76, 15/50, 7/12 and 2/2 had published anything on COVID-19 that was indexed in Scopus as of 30 August 2021. Only 18/76, 6/50, 2/12 and 0/2 of the highly visible COVID-19 media experts were women. 55 scientists in the USA, 5 in Denmark, 64 in Greece and 56 in Switzerland had a higher citation impact for their COVID-19 work than any of the evaluated highly visible media COVID-19 experts in the respective country; 10/55, 2/5, 22/64 and 14/56 of them were women.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Despite notable exceptions, there is a worrisome disconnect between COVID-19 claimed media expertise and scholarship. Highly cited women COVID-19 experts are rarely included among highly visible media experts."],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pagination":["e052856"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8551747"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Overall and COVID-19-specific citation impact of highly visible COVID-19 media experts: bibliometric analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC8551747"],"pubmed_authors":["Tezel A","Ioannidis JP","Jagsi R"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Overall and COVID-19-specific citation impact of highly visible COVID-19 media experts: bibliometric analysis.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate whether the COVID-19 experts who appear most frequently in media have high citation impact for their research overall, and for their COVID-19 peer-reviewed publications in particular and to examine the representation of women among such experts.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-linking of data sets of most highly visible COVID-19 media experts with citation data on the impact of their published work (career-long publication record and COVID-19-specific work).<h4>Setting</h4>Cable news appearance in prime-time programming or overall media appearances.<h4>Participants</h4>Most highly visible COVID-19 media experts in the USA, Switzerland, Greece and Denmark.<h4>Interventions</h4>None.<h4>Outcome measures</h4>Citation data from Scopus along with discipline-specific ranks of overall career-long and COVID-19-specific impact based on a previously validated composite citation indicator.<h4>Results</h4>We assessed 76 COVID-19 experts who were highly visible in US prime-time cable news, and 50, 12 and 2 highly visible experts in media in Denmark, Greece and Switzerland, respectively. Of those, 23/76, 10/50, 2/12 and 0/2 were among the top 2% of overall citation impact among scientists in the same discipline worldwide. Moreover, 37/76, 15/50, 7/12 and 2/2 had published anything on COVID-19 that was indexed in Scopus as of 30 August 2021. Only 18/76, 6/50, 2/12 and 0/2 of the highly visible COVID-19 media experts were women. 55 scientists in the USA, 5 in Denmark, 64 in Greece and 56 in Switzerland had a higher citation impact for their COVID-19 work than any of the evaluated highly visible media COVID-19 experts in the respective country; 10/55, 2/5, 22/64 and 14/56 of them were women.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Despite notable exceptions, there is a worrisome disconnect between COVID-19 claimed media expertise and scholarship. Highly cited women COVID-19 experts are rarely included among highly visible media experts.","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Oct","modification":"2025-04-19T15:34:48.355Z","creation":"2025-02-19T02:48:54.947Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC8551747","cross_references":{"pubmed":["34706959"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052856"]}}