<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(10)</volume><submitter>Ioannidis JP</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate whether the COVID-19 experts who appear most frequently in media have high citation impact for their research overall, and for their COVID-19 peer-reviewed publications in particular and to examine the representation of women among such experts.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-linking of data sets of most highly visible COVID-19 media experts with citation data on the impact of their published work (career-long publication record and COVID-19-specific work).&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Cable news appearance in prime-time programming or overall media appearances.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Most highly visible COVID-19 media experts in the USA, Switzerland, Greece and Denmark.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>None.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>Citation data from Scopus along with discipline-specific ranks of overall career-long and COVID-19-specific impact based on a previously validated composite citation indicator.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We assessed 76 COVID-19 experts who were highly visible in US prime-time cable news, and 50, 12 and 2 highly visible experts in media in Denmark, Greece and Switzerland, respectively. Of those, 23/76, 10/50, 2/12 and 0/2 were among the top 2% of overall citation impact among scientists in the same discipline worldwide. Moreover, 37/76, 15/50, 7/12 and 2/2 had published anything on COVID-19 that was indexed in Scopus as of 30 August 2021. Only 18/76, 6/50, 2/12 and 0/2 of the highly visible COVID-19 media experts were women. 55 scientists in the USA, 5 in Denmark, 64 in Greece and 56 in Switzerland had a higher citation impact for their COVID-19 work than any of the evaluated highly visible media COVID-19 experts in the respective country; 10/55, 2/5, 22/64 and 14/56 of them were women.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Despite notable exceptions, there is a worrisome disconnect between COVID-19 claimed media expertise and scholarship. Highly cited women COVID-19 experts are rarely included among highly visible media experts.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e052856</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8551747</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Overall and COVID-19-specific citation impact of highly visible COVID-19 media experts: bibliometric analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8551747</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tezel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ioannidis JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jagsi R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Overall and COVID-19-specific citation impact of highly visible COVID-19 media experts: bibliometric analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate whether the COVID-19 experts who appear most frequently in media have high citation impact for their research overall, and for their COVID-19 peer-reviewed publications in particular and to examine the representation of women among such experts.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-linking of data sets of most highly visible COVID-19 media experts with citation data on the impact of their published work (career-long publication record and COVID-19-specific work).&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Cable news appearance in prime-time programming or overall media appearances.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Most highly visible COVID-19 media experts in the USA, Switzerland, Greece and Denmark.&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>None.&lt;h4>Outcome measures&lt;/h4>Citation data from Scopus along with discipline-specific ranks of overall career-long and COVID-19-specific impact based on a previously validated composite citation indicator.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We assessed 76 COVID-19 experts who were highly visible in US prime-time cable news, and 50, 12 and 2 highly visible experts in media in Denmark, Greece and Switzerland, respectively. Of those, 23/76, 10/50, 2/12 and 0/2 were among the top 2% of overall citation impact among scientists in the same discipline worldwide. Moreover, 37/76, 15/50, 7/12 and 2/2 had published anything on COVID-19 that was indexed in Scopus as of 30 August 2021. Only 18/76, 6/50, 2/12 and 0/2 of the highly visible COVID-19 media experts were women. 55 scientists in the USA, 5 in Denmark, 64 in Greece and 56 in Switzerland had a higher citation impact for their COVID-19 work than any of the evaluated highly visible media COVID-19 experts in the respective country; 10/55, 2/5, 22/64 and 14/56 of them were women.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Despite notable exceptions, there is a worrisome disconnect between COVID-19 claimed media expertise and scholarship. Highly cited women COVID-19 experts are rarely included among highly visible media experts.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-19T15:34:48.355Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:48:54.947Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8551747</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34706959</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052856</doi></cross_references></HashMap>