<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>59(11)</volume><submitter>Hutchinson MJ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional cohort study.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To compare ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) on Borg's 6-20 RPE scale and Category Ratio 10 (CR10) in able-bodied (AB) participants during upper and lower body exercise, and recreationally active participants with paraplegia (PARA) and athletes with tetraplegia (TETRA) during upper body exercise only.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>University and rehabilitation centre-based laboratories in UK and Netherlands.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-four participants were equally split between AB, PARA, and TETRA. AB performed maximal tests using cycle (AB-CYC) and handcycle (AB-HC) ergometry. PARA and TETRA performed maximal handcycle and wheelchair propulsion tests, respectively. Oxygen uptake (V̇O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) and blood lactate concentration were moni</pubmed_abstract><journal>Spinal cord</journal><pagination>1162-1169</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8560635</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of two Borg exertion scales for monitoring exercise intensity in able-bodied participants, and those with paraplegia and tetraplegia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8560635</pmcid><pubmed_authors>de Groot S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hutchinson MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kouwijzer I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goosey-Tolfrey VL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of two Borg exertion scales for monitoring exercise intensity in able-bodied participants, and those with paraplegia and tetraplegia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional cohort study.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To compare ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) on Borg's 6-20 RPE scale and Category Ratio 10 (CR10) in able-bodied (AB) participants during upper and lower body exercise, and recreationally active participants with paraplegia (PARA) and athletes with tetraplegia (TETRA) during upper body exercise only.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>University and rehabilitation centre-based laboratories in UK and Netherlands.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-four participants were equally split between AB, PARA, and TETRA. AB performed maximal tests using cycle (AB-CYC) and handcycle (AB-HC) ergometry. PARA and TETRA performed maximal handcycle and wheelchair propulsion tests, respectively. Oxygen uptake (V̇O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) and blood lactate concentration were moni</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2026-03-16T16:03:10.687Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T12:46:50.119Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8560635</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34040150</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41393-021-00642-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>