<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kumar B</submitter><funding>DOD</funding><funding>Susan G. Komen for the Cure</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1802-1817</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8568628</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Breast cancers are classified into five intrinsic subtypes and 10 integrative clusters based on gene expression patterns and genomic aberrations, respectively. Although the cell-of-origin, adaptive plasticity, and genomic aberrations shape dynamic transcriptomic landscape during cancer progression, how interplay between these three core elements governs obligatory steps for a productive cancer progression is unknown. Here, we used genetic ancestry-mapped immortalized breast epithelial cell lines generated from breast biopsies of healthy women that share gene expression profiles of luminal A, normal-like, and basal-like intrinsic subtypes of breast cancers and breast cancer relevant oncogenes to develop breast cancer progression model. Using flow cytometry, mammosphere growth, signaling pathway, DNA damage response, and &lt;i>in vivo&lt;/i> tumorigenicity assays, we provide evidence that establishes cell context-dependent effects of oncogenes in conferring plasticity, self-renewal/differentiation, intratumor heterogeneity, and metastatic properties. In contrast, oncogenic aberrations, independent of cell context, shaped response to DNA damage-inducing agents. Collectively, this study reveals how the same set of genomic aberration can have distinct effects on tumor characteristics based on cell-of-origin of tumor and highlights the need to utilize multiple "normal" epithelial cell types to decipher oncogenic properties of a gene of interest. In addition, by creating multiple isogenic cell lines ranging from primary cells to metastatic variants, we provide resources to elucidate cell-intrinsic properties and cell-oncogene interactions at various stages of cancer progression. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings demonstrate that how an interplay between the normal cell type that encountered genomic aberrations and type of genomic aberration influences heterogeneity, self-renewal/differentiation, and tumor properties including propensity for metastasis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Molecular cancer research : MCR</journal><pubmed_title>Bidirectional Regulatory Cross-Talk between Cell Context and Genomic Aberrations Shapes Breast Tumorigenesis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8568628</pmcid><funding_grant_id>DOD-WH1XWH2010577</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DOD-W81XWH-15-1-0707</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA082709</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>SAC110025</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Maguire C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Temm CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobsen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakshatri H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhat-Nakshatri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sandusky G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bidirectional Regulatory Cross-Talk between Cell Context and Genomic Aberrations Shapes Breast Tumorigenesis.</name><description>Breast cancers are classified into five intrinsic subtypes and 10 integrative clusters based on gene expression patterns and genomic aberrations, respectively. Although the cell-of-origin, adaptive plasticity, and genomic aberrations shape dynamic transcriptomic landscape during cancer progression, how interplay between these three core elements governs obligatory steps for a productive cancer progression is unknown. Here, we used genetic ancestry-mapped immortalized breast epithelial cell lines generated from breast biopsies of healthy women that share gene expression profiles of luminal A, normal-like, and basal-like intrinsic subtypes of breast cancers and breast cancer relevant oncogenes to develop breast cancer progression model. Using flow cytometry, mammosphere growth, signaling pathway, DNA damage response, and &lt;i>in vivo&lt;/i> tumorigenicity assays, we provide evidence that establishes cell context-dependent effects of oncogenes in conferring plasticity, self-renewal/differentiation, intratumor heterogeneity, and metastatic properties. In contrast, oncogenic aberrations, independent of cell context, shaped response to DNA damage-inducing agents. Collectively, this study reveals how the same set of genomic aberration can have distinct effects on tumor characteristics based on cell-of-origin of tumor and highlights the need to utilize multiple "normal" epithelial cell types to decipher oncogenic properties of a gene of interest. In addition, by creating multiple isogenic cell lines ranging from primary cells to metastatic variants, we provide resources to elucidate cell-intrinsic properties and cell-oncogene interactions at various stages of cancer progression. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings demonstrate that how an interplay between the normal cell type that encountered genomic aberrations and type of genomic aberration influences heterogeneity, self-renewal/differentiation, and tumor properties including propensity for metastasis.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2026-03-31T10:52:56.652Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T03:57:04.256Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8568628</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34285086</pubmed><doi>10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0163</doi><doi>10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-21-0163</doi></cross_references></HashMap>