<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>299</volume><submitter>Zimmermann F</submitter><funding>German Federal Ministry of Defence</funding><pubmed_abstract>A number of RT-qPCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 have been published and are listed by the WHO as recommended assays. Furthermore, numerous commercial assays with undisclosed primer and probe sequences are on the market. As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progresses, the virus accrues mutations, which in some cases - as seen with the B.1.1.7 variant - can outperform and push back other strains of SARS-CoV-2. If mutations occur in primer or probe binding sites, this can impact RT-qPCR results and impede SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Here we tested the effect of primer mismatches on RT-qPCR performance in vitro using synthetic mismatch in vitro transcripts. The effects of the mismatches ranged from a shift in ct values from -0.13 to +7.61. Crucially, we found that a mismatch in the forward primer has a more detrimental effect for PCR performance than a mismatch in the reverse primer. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the original Charité RdRP primer set, which has several ambiguities, with a primer version without ambiguities and found that without ambiguities the ct values are ca. 3 ct lower. Finally, we investigated the shift in ct values observed with the Seegene Allplex kit with the B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant and found a three-nucleotide mismatch in the forward primer of the N target.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of virological methods</journal><pagination>114352</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8570391</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>In vitro evaluation of the effect of mutations in primer binding sites on detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8570391</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Urban M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zwirglmaier K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zimmermann F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kruger C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolfel R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>In vitro evaluation of the effect of mutations in primer binding sites on detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR.</name><description>A number of RT-qPCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 have been published and are listed by the WHO as recommended assays. Furthermore, numerous commercial assays with undisclosed primer and probe sequences are on the market. As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progresses, the virus accrues mutations, which in some cases - as seen with the B.1.1.7 variant - can outperform and push back other strains of SARS-CoV-2. If mutations occur in primer or probe binding sites, this can impact RT-qPCR results and impede SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Here we tested the effect of primer mismatches on RT-qPCR performance in vitro using synthetic mismatch in vitro transcripts. The effects of the mismatches ranged from a shift in ct values from -0.13 to +7.61. Crucially, we found that a mismatch in the forward primer has a more detrimental effect for PCR performance than a mismatch in the reverse primer. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the original Charité RdRP primer set, which has several ambiguities, with a primer version without ambiguities and found that without ambiguities the ct values are ca. 3 ct lower. Finally, we investigated the shift in ct values observed with the Seegene Allplex kit with the B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant and found a three-nucleotide mismatch in the forward primer of the N target.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-18T17:27:34.098Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T13:01:03.561Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8570391</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34748815</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114352</doi></cross_references></HashMap>