<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sulkar HJ</submitter><funding>National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>380-387</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8585709</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>90</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Clinical imaging often excludes the distal humerus, confounding definition of common whole-bone coordinate systems. While proximal anatomy coordinate systems exist, no simple method transforms them to whole-bone systems. Their influence on humeral kinematics is unknown.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>How do humeral kinematics vary based on proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems, and can average rotation matrices accurately convert kinematics between them?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Three proximal coordinate systems were defined by the lesser and greater tuberosities (LT, GT), Crest of the greater tuberosity, and humeral shaft. Average rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks on cadaver humeri were generated between the proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems. Absolute angl</pubmed_abstract><journal>Gait &amp; posture</journal><pubmed_title>Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8585709</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AR067196</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>S10 OD021644</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zitnay JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aliaj K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sulkar HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henninger HB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Proximal humeral coordinate systems can predict humerothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics of a full bone system.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Clinical imaging often excludes the distal humerus, confounding definition of common whole-bone coordinate systems. While proximal anatomy coordinate systems exist, no simple method transforms them to whole-bone systems. Their influence on humeral kinematics is unknown.&lt;h4>Research question&lt;/h4>How do humeral kinematics vary based on proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems, and can average rotation matrices accurately convert kinematics between them?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Three proximal coordinate systems were defined by the lesser and greater tuberosities (LT, GT), Crest of the greater tuberosity, and humeral shaft. Average rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks on cadaver humeri were generated between the proximal and whole-bone coordinate systems. Absolute angl</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-08T11:17:14.805Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T10:27:53.466Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8585709</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34564010</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.180</doi></cross_references></HashMap>