<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zou F</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>e003277</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8601082</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Current treatment guidelines for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) recommend steroids as first-line therapy, followed by selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) (infliximab or vedolizumab) for refractory cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these two SITs and their impact on cancer outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a two-center, retrospective observational cohort study of patients with IMDC who received SITs following steroids from 2016 to 2020. Patients' demographic, clinical, and overall survival data were collected and analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 184 patients (62 vedolizumab, 94 infliximab, 28 combined sequentially) were included. The efficacy of achieving clinical remission of IMDC was similar (89% vs 88%, p=0.79) between the two groups.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal for immunotherapy of cancer</journal><pubmed_title>Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab treatment for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis in patients with cancer: a two-center observational study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8601082</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA008748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Sharon E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richards DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomas A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ernstoff MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanauer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zou F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Satish D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glitza Oliva IC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shah A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faleck D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Charabaty A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harris J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McQuade J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Obeid M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolchok J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab treatment for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis in patients with cancer: a two-center observational study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Current treatment guidelines for immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) recommend steroids as first-line therapy, followed by selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) (infliximab or vedolizumab) for refractory cases. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these two SITs and their impact on cancer outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a two-center, retrospective observational cohort study of patients with IMDC who received SITs following steroids from 2016 to 2020. Patients' demographic, clinical, and overall survival data were collected and analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 184 patients (62 vedolizumab, 94 infliximab, 28 combined sequentially) were included. The efficacy of achieving clinical remission of IMDC was similar (89% vs 88%, p=0.79) between the two groups.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-10T05:48:36.801Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T13:34:21.408Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8601082</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34789551</pubmed><doi>10.1136/jitc-2021-003277</doi></cross_references></HashMap>