<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Binol H</submitter><funding>NIDCD NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders</funding><pagination>E1668-E1676</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8610175</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>131(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives/hypothesis&lt;/h4>With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Diagnostic survey analysis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Partic</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Laryngoscope</journal><pubmed_title>Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8610175</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R21 DC016972</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Yu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mattingly JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moberly AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Binol H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gurcan MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niazi MKK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Essig G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taj-Schaal N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teknos T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shah J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harris MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elmaraghy C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives/hypothesis&lt;/h4>With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Diagnostic survey analysis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Partic</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-22T09:57:57.7Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:23:30.962Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8610175</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33170529</pubmed><doi>10.1002/lary.29253</doi></cross_references></HashMap>