<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(12)</volume><submitter>Thome C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patients with large annular defects following lumbar microdiscectomy for disc herniation are at increased risk for symptomatic recurrence and reoperation.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates vs lumbar microdiscectomy alone.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial reports 5-year follow-up for enrolled patients between December 2010 and October 2014 at 21 clinical sites. Patients in this study had a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) following lumbar microdiscectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Statistical analysis was performed from November to December 2020.&lt;h4</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e2136809</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8662371</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of an Annular Closure Device to Prevent Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis With 5 Years of Follow-up.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8662371</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Bostelmann R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thome C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fluh C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Assaker R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vajkoczy P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barth M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Annular Closure RCT Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kursumovic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klassen PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eustacchio S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hes R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bouma GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van de Kelft E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nanda D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kohler HP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fandino J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martens F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arts M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brenke C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kienzler JC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of an Annular Closure Device to Prevent Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis With 5 Years of Follow-up.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patients with large annular defects following lumbar microdiscectomy for disc herniation are at increased risk for symptomatic recurrence and reoperation.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates vs lumbar microdiscectomy alone.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial reports 5-year follow-up for enrolled patients between December 2010 and October 2014 at 21 clinical sites. Patients in this study had a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) following lumbar microdiscectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Statistical analysis was performed from November to December 2020.&lt;h4</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2026-05-31T05:04:21.007Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:55:09.298Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8662371</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34882183</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36809</doi></cross_references></HashMap>