<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(1)</volume><submitter>Tan GKY</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Although both long and short cephalomedullary devices (CMDs) are used in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures, the advantages of either option are subject to debate. This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes with long versus short CMDs for extracapsular hip fractures. Studies included must have included subjects with at least 1 year of follow-up and reported on at least one of the following outcomes: rate of reoperation; rate of peri-implant fracture; operating time; blood loss; complication rate; length of hospital stay; 1-year mortality. Only articles written in the English language were included in this study. A search was conducted across the databases of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL and Scopus for arti</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pagination>23997</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8671534</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8671534</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chong CS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan GKY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bin Abd Razak HR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>Although both long and short cephalomedullary devices (CMDs) are used in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures, the advantages of either option are subject to debate. This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes with long versus short CMDs for extracapsular hip fractures. Studies included must have included subjects with at least 1 year of follow-up and reported on at least one of the following outcomes: rate of reoperation; rate of peri-implant fracture; operating time; blood loss; complication rate; length of hospital stay; 1-year mortality. Only articles written in the English language were included in this study. A search was conducted across the databases of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL and Scopus for arti</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-26T19:11:49.685Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T14:30:53.644Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8671534</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34907270</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-021-03210-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>