<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kent DM</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2277-2286</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8672231</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>326(22)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated strokes comprise approximately 10% of ischemic strokes in adults aged 18 to 60 years. While device closure decreases stroke recurrence risk overall, the best treatment for any individual is often unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence based on previously developed scoring systems.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Investigators for the Systematic, Collaborative, PFO Closure Evaluation (SCOPE) Consortium pooled individual patient data from all 6 randomized clinical trials that compared PFO closure plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-associated stroke, and included a total of 3740 participants. The trials were conducted worldwide </pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA</journal><pubmed_title>Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8672231</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002544</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Song JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee PH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soendergaard L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Derumeaux G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chatellier G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Furlan AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lefebvre B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carroll JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smalling RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koethe B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thaler DE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saver JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meier B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reisman M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herrmann HC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mas JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kasner SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mattle HP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kent DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Juni P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated strokes comprise approximately 10% of ischemic strokes in adults aged 18 to 60 years. While device closure decreases stroke recurrence risk overall, the best treatment for any individual is often unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate heterogeneity of treatment effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence based on previously developed scoring systems.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Investigators for the Systematic, Collaborative, PFO Closure Evaluation (SCOPE) Consortium pooled individual patient data from all 6 randomized clinical trials that compared PFO closure plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-associated stroke, and included a total of 3740 participants. The trials were conducted worldwide </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Dec</publication><modification>2025-05-18T12:49:54.323Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T09:05:10.218Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8672231</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34905030</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jama.2021.20956</doi></cross_references></HashMap>