<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>65</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11</volume><submitter>Szymankiewicz M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Invasive &lt;i>Candida glabrata&lt;/i> infections are not common complications after radical cystoprostatectomy. Furthermore, resistance to echinocandins arising during the course of a patient's treatment is rarely recognised. We described a case of development of echinocandin resistance in a patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2b N0 M0, high grade) diagnosis, subjected to radical cystoprostatectomy and exposed to echinocandins. A male patient with a previous surgical history after a traffic accident, who was operated on due to bladder cancer, underwent an episode of candidemia and mixed postoperative wound and urinary tract infection caused by &lt;i>C. glabrata&lt;/i> and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing &lt;i>Escherichia coli&lt;/i> during hospital treatment. The patient was started on caspofungin. Repeat blood cultures showed clearance of the bloodstream infection; however, infection persisted at the surgical site. Resistance to echinocandins developed within 2 months from the day of initiation of therapy with caspofungin in the &lt;i>C. glabrata&lt;/i> strain obtained from the surgical site. The isolates sequentially obtained during the patient's treatment demonstrated resistance to echinocandins due to the mutation in hotspot 1 &lt;i>FKS2&lt;/i>. Although resistance to echinocandins is relatively rare, it should be considered in oncological patients with increased complexity of treatment and intestinal surgery.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>794235</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC8714647</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Case Report: Echinocandin-Resistance &lt;i>Candida glabrata FKS&lt;/i> Mutants From Patient Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy Due to Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC8714647</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Nowikiewicz T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szymankiewicz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamecki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oledzka G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jarzynka S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koryszewska-Baginska A</pubmed_authors><view_count>65</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Case Report: Echinocandin-Resistance &lt;i>Candida glabrata FKS&lt;/i> Mutants From Patient Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy Due to Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.</name><description>Invasive &lt;i>Candida glabrata&lt;/i> infections are not common complications after radical cystoprostatectomy. Furthermore, resistance to echinocandins arising during the course of a patient's treatment is rarely recognised. We described a case of development of echinocandin resistance in a patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2b N0 M0, high grade) diagnosis, subjected to radical cystoprostatectomy and exposed to echinocandins. A male patient with a previous surgical history after a traffic accident, who was operated on due to bladder cancer, underwent an episode of candidemia and mixed postoperative wound and urinary tract infection caused by &lt;i>C. glabrata&lt;/i> and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing &lt;i>Escherichia coli&lt;/i> during hospital treatment. The patient was started on caspofungin. Repeat blood cultures showed clearance of the bloodstream infection; however, infection persisted at the surgical site. Resistance to echinocandins developed within 2 months from the day of initiation of therapy with caspofungin in the &lt;i>C. glabrata&lt;/i> strain obtained from the surgical site. The isolates sequentially obtained during the patient's treatment demonstrated resistance to echinocandins due to the mutation in hotspot 1 &lt;i>FKS2&lt;/i>. Although resistance to echinocandins is relatively rare, it should be considered in oncological patients with increased complexity of treatment and intestinal surgery.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2024-10-19T07:07:39.962Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T14:49:18.893Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC8714647</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34976835</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2021.794235</doi></cross_references></HashMap>